I wonder whether a significant number of the judges who would be on a full-panel review let these three know they would lose at the full panel level, usually the next stop in the line of appeal. As for the USSC not reviewing the original ruling, nothing prevents that from happening anyway, "immediately" or in the more ordinary line of appeal (I assume LIEden's CDC won't willingly let their tyranny be blocked short of the USSC).
Fixed an omission.