“Energy Transition” = Energy Regression

[rangerrebew]

“Energy Transition” = Energy Regression

In this issue:

    Energy Transition = Energy Regression
    How Climate Science Gets Distorted
    Upcoming Accelerator Call
    Quick updates

Energy Transition = Energy Regression

Tomorrow I’ll be recording a speech for an event about “the energy transition.”

When most people hear the term “energy transition,” associated with the increased use of solar and wind, they think it means “economic evolution”–like freely going from horse-and-buggy to automobile. In fact, “energy transition” is a�political and religious energy regression.

“Energy transition” is political because without government mandates and subsidies, almost zero wind and solar would exist.

“Energy transition” is religious because it insists on “natural” wind and solar and rejects cost-effective hydro and nuclear for impacting nature too much.

See�“Energy Transition”�at�EnergyTalkingPoints.com�for more details on why this “energy transition” is actually “energy regression.”

https://industrialprogress.com/energy-transition-energy-regression/

[IsailedawayfromFR]

stated well.

To attempt to displace proven forms of energy like coal, nuclear and gas/oil with schemes proven to be costly and unworkable is to throw us back a hundred years on the achievement scale of progress

[Joe Wooten]

stated well.

To attempt to displace proven forms of energy like coal, nuclear and gas/oil with schemes proven to be costly and unworkable is to throw us back a hundred years on the achievement scale of progress

That is the minimum goal. Max would be back 400 years, except for the aristocrats who will run things.....