Author Topic: More Evidence of the Uselessness of “Green” Energy  (Read 462 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,500
More Evidence of the Uselessness of “Green” Energy
« on: July 09, 2021, 10:33:59 pm »
Powerline by John Hinderaker  July 8, 2021

At AmericanExperiment.org, my colleague Isaac Orr deals a double-barreled blow to the fantasy of “green” energy. First, after all of the hype surrounding wind and solar energy, where did Americans actually get their energy in 2020? This chart tells the story:


All “renewable” sources together account for only 12% of our energy consumption, but the details make the story even worse:

    It is very interesting to note that burning wood, which is the oldest form of energy consumption in the country, is still producing more useful energy than solar power, despite the billions of dollars that have been spent propping up the industry.

What an utter failure.

Second, why does wind power supply so little electricity, despite the many billions that have been spent on it? The most basic reason is that 60% of the time, a given wind turbine produces nothing. The liberals’ response to this fact is to advocate massive overbuilding of capacity, on the theory that the wind must be blowing somewhere. Unfortunately, that isn’t true:

More: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/07/more-evidence-of-the-uselessness-of-green-energy.php

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,746
Re: More Evidence of the Uselessness of “Green” Energy
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2021, 01:18:21 am »
Uselessness summed up on one chart.
At midnight on June 24, 2021, wind turbines were operating at about 80 percent of their capacity factor, but by 11 am on June 30, 2021, all of the wind turbines in the 15 state regional grid were generating just 0.71 percent of their potential output.
If we were so foolish as to depend on wind for our electricity, we would suffer frequent blackouts no matter how many turbines we pay for. But of course we don’t do that. We continue to maintain dispatchable (i.e., reliable) power plants–coal, natural gas and nuclear as well as hydropower. Wind and solar are expensive and irrelevant add-ons to an electric grid that was working perfectly well–better, in fact–before they came along.

Isaac Orr concludes:

The data above demonstrate an important aspect of wind generation that few people seem to realize: it can provide virtually zero electricity even with massive installations of wind turbines. Becoming more dependent upon an unreliable resource that comes and goes as it pleases is a dangerous way to structure an electric grid, as Texas and California have found out the hard way.
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington