It does. In fact, many scholars think the Torah "borrows" from Zoroastrianism.
No it doesn't... And 'scholars' who rely on oldest extant copies to date things are flat out ignorant... That brag went around for centuries against the Masoretic text when the earliest extant copy was from the 1100s
Oops! looky there, here comes the Dead Sea Scrolls to knock back the early extant copy of proto-Masoretic back to 300 BC.
And the Hinnom Scroll (c.700bc), fragmentary and small as it is, places formulaic biblical scripture at least contemporary with Zoroaster (c.600bc), at which point, which is borrowing from the other becomes a mystery.
Fortunately, internal proofs unique to the Biblical Scriptures blow any other thing right out of the water... Because once those proofs are understood, one first has to admit the intellect that put them there - Far far beyond the means of mere men. And one capable of such proofs aforehand has no need to borrow.