Really?
Churchill’s attitude toward Turkey eased after he became War Secretary in January 1919. He found British forces stretched thin as the armies receded during demobilization. “There were seeds of trouble everywhere,” he warned the Cabinet in August. Withdrawal from the Caucasus “would be the signal for a general massacre of the Armenians.” On the other hand, he wished to remove British troops from Turkey. They would be better employed keeping the peace in other parts of the old Ottoman Empire
Churchill strongly backed Atatürk. “By regaining our influence over the Turks,” he said, “we should be able to do something to save the Armenians….”16 In 1921, Turkish forces opposing the Greeks threatened to march on British garrison at Chanak. Churchill urged “a friendly peace.” (This is incidentally the opposite of that bellicose attitude his critics say he habitually adopted.) Hostilities with Britain were avoided. In 1923-24, Atatürk signed the Treaty of Lausanne, which established the borders of modern Turkey.
----------------------------
Your assertion about Churchill dealt w/The Armenian Genocide; so when you're called out
as absurd, you simply change the subject and timeline. How predictable.
Suggest you listen up and learn something!!!
The Ottoman Caliphate was established around 1540, enduring for some 5 centuries.
It was viscerally hostile to Christians/Christianity engaging in many assaults on this
minority, most aggressively in 1895, killing more than 100,000 and again in 1915
killing far more; around 1.5 million.
The catalyst behind this Ottoman paranoia was their neurotic belief that Armenian
Peasants were secret allies of Czarist Russia, intent on overthrowing the Caliphate.
Repeating, Churchill did nothing to mitigate the impact of the Armenian Genocide
during WW1, NOTHING!
Nor did he do anything to mitigate the tragedy at Gallipoli on the Dardanelles
Peninsula that same year, which cost the Australian & New Zealand Allies some
250,000 casualties.
As First Lord of the British Admiralty since 1914, Logistics & Planning for that assault,
which Churchill promoted, were his core responsibility.
Churchill had many pluses during his lifetime; yet military competence was hardly
one of them.