The article wasn't behind a pay wall @PeteS in CA --- I read it without a problem in full --- including photos, maps and videos.
I'm not going to comment further on your post since you didn't read the article....which is remarkably well researched and evenhanded with a response from the organization and Sec. Chao to each issue raised. You're still doing the kneejerk thing. I'd prefer to engage with the intellect thing.
Ciao.
For me it was behind the NYT's paywall (I include sites that require the viewers give their email address under that term, since the result will be receiving advertising). Why are you essentially calling me a liar,
@Right_in_Virginia?
Like I posted below,
can we move from six-degrees-of-separation-grade guilt-by-association to something weird, like evidence? If a company doing significant business in China makes their employees Chinese spies then I'm a Chinese spy. Is an immediate member of my family a Chinese spy because of being ethnic Chinese? How far will this
I read it on the Internet conspiracy-theory paranoia go?! Got real evidence? Produce it. An insinuation-laden NYT guilt-by-vague-association hit-piece is not evidence (do I have to remind how crazy-inaccurate and untrue the NYT's Hate-Trump hit-pieces have been the past five and counting years?).
If asking evidence to support a serious accusation -
still waiting, @Victoria33, where's the evidence Trump tried to murder Mike Pence? - is being "kneejerk", well, yeah. By that standard our criminal court system is "kneejerk".