Paging @HoustonSam for some unvarnished truth!
I'm flattered and humbled
@Cyber Liberty that you would consider me a source of unvarnished truth; others here are just as truthful as I. And I see that
@mikezpen has asked for input from someone who knows the law; I'm not a lawyer, just a man with an opinion.
My opinion mikezpen is that there is very good evidence for fraud and other sorts of malfeasance in the 2020 election,
and that the courts are not all systematically corrupt and biased against Trump. Almost everyone here will agree with the first proposition; the problem is how to also explain the second proposition.
My belief is that the American legal system has fallen captive to its own arcane language and distorted reasoning, such that it no longer delivers decisions that agree with the plain meaning and interpretation of words we can all read and understand. The courts are not institutionally biased against Trump distinctly (no doubt *some* are *very* biased against him), they are institutionally biased against all of us who assert the right and capability to read and understand the Constitution for ourselves.
The first half of the linked article here makes the case very well :
http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,424539.msg2354695.html#msg2354695One of my own statements of the same idea is given here :
http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,422570.msg2344183.html#msg2344183I'll close by repeating one of the arguments I've made against the American Judiciary in hopes it will clarify my position : they would have us believe that the Constitution *does not* mean what it *does* say about arms, and that it *does* mean what it *does not* say about abortion. This is gaslighting, pure and simple, and the day must come when we cast it off.