Inflammatory claims that the election was stolen, presented without actionable evidence. He had every right to pursue such claims up until the point when the States had certified their electors . At that point it was his responsibility to concede. But instead he inspired a deadly mob - an idiotic and deadly blunder.
Holy sh*t! Are you writing for CNN?
Evidence has been presented for your viewing. If it wasn't, why would fecebook and twitter and youtube be scrubbing the web? Statistical impossibilities, etc, provide enough of a preponderance of evidence that courts would not even look at, sufficient to convince a small multitude, Your assertions that such evidence does not exist has less weight than the sworn affidavits of those who witnessed it.
If the States illegally certified the results and the electors, does that suddenly make wrong right? NOPE. Sure doesn't, and I will not honor the claimed results or a Biden Administration nor give ANY weight to any law passed by that illegal occupation of the Presidency.
Deadly mob? You'd have been statistically safer to be in that crowd than just among an average group of 300,000 Americans, of which 7 would have died on any given day. One person had a heart attack. One suffered the misfortune of being fatally injured in the crowd press (another reason I don't like crowds), one was injured (different rumors about how that happened, but blamed on someone in the crowd), another with no C.O.D. that I have heard, and one was shot by police.
Funny, how a
white woman being shot by police doesn't spark riots and destruction and widespread looting and burning, but I'd wager if she'd been of a darker hued complexion, Washington would still be burning.
There is no comparison.