We all saw the same pictures. Thousands? Hundreds? Dozens? Let's just say it was a crap ton of people. Since I strive to be accurate I will edit my post.
I'm originally from a small town. As in well under 1000 people. I have seen more people show up for a church dinner than there were actually inside the building, and only a fraction of those were breaking things. So few, I'd guess that most were ANTIFA/BLM plants. Which would be about right, considering there were accounts of five shuttle buses showing up full of ANTIFA/BLM folks in blacbloc under their Trump swag. Especially seeing video of them being let into the building, and led up the stairs. It's nice to have a guide in a labyrinth.
Funny thing about people, they will see what they want to. In the wide shots, there are a couple of people breaking stuff. But zoom in and it looks like everyone was. Sure, it is likely some Trump supporters got caught up in the 'fervor' the agitators generated, but the agitators are professionals, they've likely had practice in the streets of a major city last summer, and emotions were running high. They got 'played'. It pays to remember the rules your momma taught you, but sometimes people forget. Considering there were estimated to be 300K people there (likely multiples of that), storming the joint for real would have it pretty well a stripped and smoldering ruin, but these are conservative and they just don't know how to loot, pillage, and burn like Leftists. Either that, or there was no intent to have that general effect. A few agents provocateur could make it look effective for select cameras run by, say, people deeply involved with BLM, for instance. Who shot Ashli Babbit, anyway?
Beyond that nonsense, though, I still failed to hear what Trump said that was seditious, and I failed to hear where he espoused violence or destruction of property, especially that property belonging to us all.
So maybe you could point that specific language out to me.
