Courts to Voters: Democrat Election Fraud Is ‘Too Big to Fail’
We will not have another fair election in our country. There is no “next time.â€
By Karin McQuillan
December 13, 2020
The courts have spoken, one after another. Some 74 million Americans have been denied our day in court. The Democrats’ crime of stealing a presidential election is too big to fail.
Our play-it-safe judges don’t want to venture into these enormous seas, full of sharks, without precedent. They want to say in the safe spaces of the familiar. Stealing an election for city council is familiar enough to be overturned by law. Stealing a presidential election by wholesale fraud is above the law.
One might think that somehow our laws are written too narrowly to catch the whale of Democrat fraud in the election, but for one thing: the declarations from the bench that it is unthinkable to “upend an election.†Our judges tell us that ruling fraudulent ballots invalid would “disenfranchise†millions of voters. These are political statements. They are pusillanimous statements. They are not legal statements.
Upending an election has no precedent, we are told. But stealing a presidential election on this scale has no precedent, either. The courts are saying that if election crimes are so consequential, they require a politically consequential act to be redressed, then no redress is allowed.
That doesn’t even make sense.
We are told there is no redress because the problem is political.
Yes, stealing an election is political. It is also illegal. It is also unconstitutional.
The judges’ angry rebukes of the Republican plaintiffs are bogus by the very terms they use. If our judges are not willing to “disenfranchise†fraudulent and illegal votes, then they are disenfranchising the entire country.
more
https://amgreatness.com/2020/12/13/courts-to-voters-democrat-election-fraud-is-too-big-to-fail/
