Will the Supreme Court ignore the stolen election?

[mystery-ak]

December 10, 2020
Will the Supreme Court ignore the stolen election?
By Robert Arvay

Remember the famous football game?  It wasn't just a pass-interference infraction that caused the controversy.  It was blatant.  It was seen on live television by millions of football fans.  The pass defender virtually crawled up on top of the back of the intended receiver before the ball reached either player.  The referee saw it, right squarely in front of himself.  There was no doubt that, because of the required penalty, the game would therefore soon be won by the passing team, the team that had been illegally interfered with.

But the referee called it an incomplete pass, no interference, no penalty, in effect ending the game in favor of the team that had committed the infraction.  In football, this is referred to as a non-call.

When millions of people see a rules violation in football, and when the violation is permitted to go unpenalized, there is controversy, anger, and much discussion, after which all is soon forgotten.

When the same thing happens in a presidential election, when millions of people see the steal, and when the legislatures and courts do nothing, it is called corruption.  More than that, it is corruption so deep, so pervasive and widespread, that we are at a loss for words.

more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/will_the_supreme_court_ignore_the_stolen_election.html

[Fishrrman]

It's gonna be hard for the conservative members of the Court (5, not counting Roberts any more) to "ignore" the implications of the stolen election.

For one of the louder catcalls from the democrat-communists has been their threat to increase the size of the Supreme Court, thus politicizing it and also diluting whatever influence the 5 conservatives have.

They just ACHIEVED a solid working majority.
Are they going to surrender it away, by refusing to hear the merits of the Texas case?

It's not only the future integrity of American elections that's at stake, it's the integrity of the Supreme Court itself...

[libertybele]

It's gonna be hard for the conservative members of the Court (5, not counting Roberts any more) to "ignore" the implications of the stolen election.

For one of the louder catcalls from the democrat-communists has been their threat to increase the size of the Supreme Court, thus politicizing it and also diluting whatever influence the 5 conservatives have.

They just ACHIEVED a solid working majority.
Are they going to surrender it away, by refusing to hear the merits of the Texas case?

It's not only the future integrity of American elections that's at stake, it's the integrity of the Supreme Court itself...

The integrity of this Supreme Court will be short lived -- the DEMS will pack the court and once that is done, it is truly time to start a new Constitutional Conservative party. 

We all know that if and when the GOP loses the Senate, the party dies anyways.

[skeeter]

The integrity of this Supreme Court will be short lived -- the DEMS will pack the court and once that is done, it is truly time to start a new Constitutional Conservative party. 

We all know that if and when the GOP loses the Senate, the party dies anyways.

I wonder if the future efficacy - legitimacy - of the SCOTUS will be in the back of the minds of the remaining five reasonable justices as they weigh what their role in remedying the mess the rats have made of the election should be, since they have a chance to effect the course of events AND do the right thing here.