Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome

[Bigun]

Again - the issue isn't that fraud did not occur.  It is that there is no credible evidence that it arose to a level that would even come close to changing the result.   Biden won.  Trump lost.  By over 7 million votes.   That's not me saying that,  or even the WSJ.   It is the American people.

You don't have to like it. Just respect their decision.   Or be a whining, destructive sore loser like Stacey Abrams.

Calculate what tabulation machines in 26 states converting every Trump vote to .87 votes and every Biden vote to 1.13 votes can do and get back to me.
 

[txradioguy]

Speaking of which.... it's no wonder that Jazzy seems to be on-board with a Biden win... since Biden has said he will "tax" guns owned by Americans....

just like Jazzy has  been wanting all along.

You also have to understand that Jazzy...along with his pet puppy Knox aren't even little R republicans.

They are Progressive Democrats through and through.

[Cyber Liberty]

Speaking of which.... it's no wonder that Jazzy seems to be on-board with a Biden win... since Biden has said he will "tax" guns owned by Americans....

just like Jazzy has  been wanting all along.

It's worse then taxing guns...it's Insuring them which by definition requires registration, his protestations to the contrary.

[Cyber Liberty]

Calculate what tabulation machines in 26 states converting every Trump vote to .87 votes and every Biden vote to 1.13 votes can do and get back to me.

That would require doing Arithmetic, and lawyers are notoriously bad at that.

[Cyber Liberty]

You also have to understand that Jazzy...along with his pet puppy Knox aren't even little R republicans.

They are Progressive Democrats through and through.

I think they voted for Shortbus Joe.

[catfish1957]

You wish 


How do you tell a Communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

In about his 30th post, Knox27 admitted he was a MSM sheeple. So what do you expect from an individual who bases his POV and thoughts around sourcing that is nothing but a packs of lies?

[XenaLee]

You also have to understand that Jazzy...along with his pet puppy Knox aren't even little R republicans.

They are Progressive Democrats through and through.

You  betcha.   And considering that this is supposed to be a Conservative forum....

that qualifies them as "troll" status.... eh?   It's ok.   Every forum has to have at least a few.    For diversity.   

[catfish1957]

You  betcha.   And considering that this is supposed to be a Conservative forum....

that qualifies them as "troll" status.... eh?   It's ok.   Every forum has to have at least a few.    For diversity.

I don't mind them here at all.  It's kind of like Killer Whales playiing toss with a seal.

[Hoodat]

Calculate what tabulation machines in 26 states converting every Trump vote to .87 votes and every Biden vote to 1.13 votes can do and get back to me.

In Montgomery County, Pennsylvania alone, correcting this would net Trump over 64,000 votes.  Add Chester County, and Trump nets another 40,000 votes.  Just those two counties alone are enough for Trump to win Pennsylvania.  So when @Jazzhead says that it isn't enough to sway the election, he is lying.

[Cyber Liberty]

I don't mind them here at all.  It's kind of like Killer Whales playiing toss with a seal.

Yeah, I see the value in that.  Now, when the seals get nasty with personal attacks, Mods have to step in.   

[XenaLee]

I don't mind them here at all.  It's kind of like Killer Whales playiing toss with a seal.

In keeping with the sea life theme.... I think of them more as baby sharks.   Not big enough to pose a real threat... but just annoying enough to deserve an occasional schmack to send them swimming the other way.     

[XenaLee]

In Montgomery County, Pennsylvania alone, correcting this would net Trump over 64,000 votes.  Add Chester County, and Trump nets another 40,000 votes.  Just those two counties alone are enough for Trump to win Pennsylvania.  So when @Jazzhead says that it isn't enough to sway the election, he is lying.

It's what they do, after all.

[txradioguy]

You  betcha.   And considering that this is supposed to be a Conservative forum....

that qualifies them as "troll" status.... eh?   It's ok.   Every forum has to have at least a few.    For diversity.

Liberal trolls show up for various reasons.  Some do in hopes of getting banned immediately in order to "own the Cons" for being intolerant of other views.  DU was good at that when I was at Conservative Underground and Conservative Cave.  The Viking Kitties cleaned up a few trolls like that at TOS as well.

Others come here to try and dazzle us with their brilliant thought on why things should be the way they want them...again in order to make you and I out to be intolerant racist bigots/homophobes/xenophobes for not agreeing with them.

The ones we have here right now want to convince us that the party will be better off with a Dem Lite squish like Kasich or Jeb because of their "common sense" approach to working together in DC.

Again...with the end result of making the rest of us appearing intolerant and inflexible.

[txradioguy]

In about his 30th post, Knox27 admitted he was a MSM sheeple. So what do you expect from an individual who bases his POV and thoughts around sourcing that is nothing but a packs of lies?

I expect nothing less than what he's delivered so far.

[Cyber Liberty]

Liberal trolls show up for various reasons.  Some do in hopes of getting banned immediately in order to "own the Cons" for being intolerant of other views.  DU was good at that when I was at Conservative Underground and Conservative Cave.  The Viking Kitties cleaned up a few trolls like that at TOS as well.

Others come here to try and dazzle us with their brilliant thought on why things should be the way they want them...again in order to make you and I out to be intolerant racist bigots/homophobes/xenophobes for not agreeing with them.

The ones we have here right now want to convince us that the party will be better off with a Dem Lite squish like Kasich or Jeb because of their "common sense" approach to working together in DC.

Again...with the end result of making the rest of us appearing intolerant and inflexible.

"Magafanatic" was worse than that.  He came on here to convince people to throw both Senate seats in GA away, in order to flip the Senate.  He got the bum's rush in less than 10 posts.

[txradioguy]

I think they voted for Shortbus Joe.

I have no doubt that they did.  Especially Jazzy after his diatribes earlier this year (or was it last year?) about how Trump needed to step aside "for the sake of the party" and let someone like Kasich step in to represent the GOP in the 2020 election.

[Knox27]

California AB 5

Obamacare

They hate private equity firms:
https://thehill.com/hilltv

Biden has vowed to repeal the PLCAA

They also want your 401K
https://www.rollcall.com/2020/08/24/biden-retirement-proposal-would-upend-traditional-401k-plans/

Except it's not.  I've spent my entire life dealing with the media.  The majority of them...a good 90-05% hate normal Americans and think AOC's proposals don't go far enough.  They believe that any time Republicans score a huge political win (like the 1994 GOP takeover of the House) America...in the words of Peter Jennings is having a "tantrum".

You only have to look at what stories the media promotes and the ones they ignore or spike all together to know what their true feelings are.

And everything they support...is socialist/communist in nature and outcome.

Means to an end.  Their goal is Socialist utopia.  The Cloward-Piven strategy at work.


And yet you ignore the words that are put out there every day by the media that show what you're denying.

Perhaps you should actually read some of those words.

So to be very clear. Your first two examples of socialism are:

1. A California bill that reclassifies independent contractors to employees (of the private business).  Its close to socialism to be fair, arguably the definition of excessive govt regulation but still only state level.  Its a bad law, its highly contested even in super liberal California. Its also the. Only. Thing. You. Found. One thing.

2. Obamacare, an idea that originated in a conservative think tank that requires people to buy private non govt run insurance much the same that you're required to buy car insurance to drive on public roads.  Very much not socialism but since the Democrat passed it, you dont care, ipso facto its socialistic to you.  Not the best solution to our problems maybe, but not socialism

What else did you mention...ahh biden wants to repeal the law that the government used to shield gun manufacturers.  So in your head, the law that the govt enacted that said you couldn't sue a private business was not socialism, but repealing that law is socialism??

Is that right? Is that actually how you see that law?  The repeal of which to you is socialism?  Seriously that's your best example?

Also also im not saying I agree with the repeal. But that ain't socialism.

Further more you just lie and make up numbers withiut any source about members of the media, who are assuredly more sympathetic to the left than the avg American.  But to say most are to the left of the squad is frankly retarded to use a word im hearing I shouldn't use anymore.

Socialism is not imminent, its not even close. Not on the horizon.  Read about the definitions of mixed economies, pure capitalism, socialism, state capitalism, welfare capitalism because some aspects of some of those systems are actually a potential concern.  Not the socialism one.  Is a boogeyman for stupid people here. 

[txradioguy]

"Magafanatic" was worse than that.  He came on here to convince people to throw both Senate seats in GA away, in order to flip the Senate.  He got the bum's rush in less than 10 posts.

Some require a swifter form of justice than others.

There's a ton of Trump supporting people on social media advocating the same thing he did.  We'll probably get a few more like him the closer it gets to January.

[XenaLee]

Liberal trolls show up for various reasons.  Some do in hopes of getting banned immediately in order to "own the Cons" for being intolerant of other views.  DU was good at that when I was at Conservative Underground and Conservative Cave.  The Viking Kitties cleaned up a few trolls like that at TOS as well.

Others come here to try and dazzle us with their brilliant thought on why things should be the way they want them...again in order to make you and I out to be intolerant racist bigots/homophobes/xenophobes for not agreeing with them.

The ones we have here right now want to convince us that the party will be better off with a Dem Lite squish like Kasich or Jeb because of their "common sense" approach to working together in DC.

Again...with the end result of making the rest of us appearing intolerant and inflexible.

Well in my case, they can save themselves the trouble.   I AM intolerant and inflexible when it comes to tolerating the radical left.   And I don't plan to change.   Ever.   

[Knox27]

In about his 30th post, Knox27 admitted he was a MSM sheeple. So what do you expect from an individual who bases his POV and thoughts around sourcing that is nothing but a packs of lies?

I read msm but you're the one that knows to label people as sheeple.  Its beyond my knowledge and imagination to know that I was mindlessly part of a herd lapping up fake news.

[Cyber Liberty]

So to be very clear. Your first two examples of socialism are:

...

@Knox27

Playing with definitions is a refuge of the scoundrels. 

[Knox27]

@Knox27

Playing with definitions is a refuge of the scoundrels.

Facts too it seems here

[Cyber Liberty]

Facts too it seems here

How would you know?  You haven't presented any facts.

[txradioguy]

So to be very clear. Your first two examples of socialism are:

1. A California bill that reclassifies independent contractors to employees (of the private business).  Its close to socialism to be fair, arguably the definition of excessive govt regulation but still only state level.  Its a bad law, its highly contested even in super liberal California. Its also the. Only. Thing. You. Found. One thing.

You asked for one example...you got that plus more.  There were dozens more...but I knew trying to show them to you would be pointless.

Like I told your alter ego Jazzy "there are none so blind"...

2. Obamacare, an idea that originated in a conservative think tank that requires people to buy private non govt run insurance much the same that you're required to buy car insurance to drive on public roads.  Very much not socialism but since the Democrat passed it, you dont care, ipso facto its socialistic to you.  Not the best solution to our problems maybe, but not socialism

Yes back in 1992...tell us something we don't know.  But after research and cost analysis that same Conservative think tank as well as Republicans in general backed away from it as quickly as they could.  The Libs like yourself own that "idea" now.  And Obama admitted that the ACA was a first step towards single payer.  That would see the government take over and federalize 1/7th of the national economy.

What do you think happens to the private businesses tied to healthcare then?

That's very much socialism and the government putting private business out of well...business.

What else did you mention...ahh biden wants to repeal the law that the government used to shield gun manufacturers.  So in your head, the law that the govt enacted that said you couldn't sue a private business was not socialism, but repealing that law is socialism??

Do you know how many small (50 people or less) businesses there are in the firearms industry that would be affected by something like this?

You don't have a clue do you?  That's not only Socialism it's proving the point about Government trying to ruin private industry.  Biden, Hillary and others have said numerous times...their goal is to bankrupt and end the firearms industry in America.

Is that right? Is that actually how you see that law?  The repeal of which to you is socialism?  Seriously that's your best example?

It's one of many best examples

Also also im not saying I agree with the repeal. But that ain't socialism.

Clearly you don't know what Socialism is...or you're being willfully ignorant.

Further more you just lie and make up numbers withiut any source about members of the media, who are assuredly more sympathetic to the left than the avg American.  But to say most are to the left of the squad is frankly retarded to use a word im hearing I shouldn't use anymore.

I don't make up numbers and unlike you I don't lie.

The answer to the press’ myopia lies elsewhere, and nobody has produced a better argument for how the national media missed the Trump story than FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver, who pointed out that the ideological clustering in top newsrooms led to groupthink. “As of 2013, only 7 percent of [journalists] identified as Republicans,” Silver wrote in March, chiding the press for its political homogeneity. Just after the election, presidential strategist Steve Bannon savaged the press on the same point but with a heartier vocabulary. “The media bubble is the ultimate symbol of what’s wrong with this country,” Bannon said. “It’s just a circle of people talking to themselves who have no bleep idea what’s going on.”

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/04/25/media-bubble-real-journalism-jobs-east-coast-215048

Digest a large cloth container of richards you obtuse dolt.

Socialism is not imminent, its not even close. Not on the horizon.  Read about the definitions of mixed economies, pure capitalism, socialism, state capitalism, welfare capitalism because some aspects of some of those systems are actually a potential concern.  Not the socialism one.  Is a boogeyman for stupid people here.

If it wren't for cheating by the DNC itself...Bernie Sanders would have crushed Hillary in the primaries in 2016 and probably defeated Trump.

Why is that?

He preached and continues to preach socialism/communism as the answer to our problems and there is a growing number of brain dead voters who think he's right.

[Bigun]

I don't mind them here at all.  It's kind of like Killer Whales playiing toss with a seal.

In keeping with that theme, I wonder if @Jazzhead, who claims to be a lawyer in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, would explain to us what the Constitution of his state requires for election law to be changed.