He crossed his arms and huffed, his face reddening.
"Every knows its fake! They made up the data! Everyone knows! You're a sheep! Ice cores! Sunspots! "
Let's put it this way. In 1983, and again in the 1990s I worked in places where the official temperature was reported as -54 degrees Fahrenheit. (incidentally, that is the temperature where mercury solidifies). Unofficially, the temperature at one of those locations was -60, read on a 'spirit' thermometer that used alcohol instead of mercury. Those readings were verified in the official records when I could first access them on the internet, but have been since 'revised' upward to -50 degrees.
Such data revisions only serve to raise temperatures in the official record,which we are supposed to accept as proof that the planet is in some catastrophic warming cycle. If it is, it isn't humans, and the warming and cooling cycles in the past, where CO2 is a trailing indicator*, occurred without human intervention.
The only reason to suddenly blame humans for climate is to advance the concept of global control, something that can't be done without some boogeyman that threatens everyone equally. Of course, if you just send lots of money, that will help stabilize the planet's temperature, too.
*If you consider the solubility of CO2 in water, it is more soluble in cold water than warm, so the CO2 content of the atmosphere trails temperature because the oceans take time to cool or warm,and the solubility of CO2 in those bodies of water increases or decreases with the temperature of the water. That is why CO2 trails the temperature, and is an indicator, not a forcing factor.
