Trump attorney says former DHS cybersecurity chief should be 'taken out at dawn and shot'

[mystery-ak]

Trump attorney says former DHS cybersecurity chief should be 'taken out at dawn and shot'
by Anthony Leonardi, Breaking News Reporter
 | November 30, 2020 09:07 PM

Trump legal team member Joe diGenova said Chris Krebs, a former cybsersecurity official at the Homeland Security Department fired by President Trump, should be shot.

The former U.S. attorney made the comments on Monday while appearing on Newsmax with host Howie Carr, reacting to Krebs's interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes that aired the night before.

"Anybody who thinks that this election went well, like that idiot Krebs," diGenova began, "that guy is a class-A moron. He should be drawn and quartered, taken out at dawn and shot."

more w/video
http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php?action=pm;f=inbox;l=-1;done=sent

[Knox27]

The lawyer for the president of the United States has advocated for the execution of a former govt official fired for saying a truth harmful to the presidents political ambitions.

For anyone paying attention, this is the 3rd world stuff you dont want coming to the United states

[skeeter]

The lawyer for the president of the United States has advocated for the execution of a former govt official fired for saying a truth harmful to the presidents political ambitions.

For anyone paying attention, this is the 3rd world stuff you dont want coming to the United states

Yeah never mind an actual stolen presidential election.

Perhaps Trumps attorney should be jailed like Roger Stone was for threatening to kidnap a therapy dog.

[Knox27]

Yeah never mind an actual stolen presidential election.

Perhaps Trumps attorney should be jailed like Roger Stone was for threatening to kidnap a therapy dog.

So how many people, all told, do you think we're involved in this "stolen election"

Like how many people does it take to all work together to commit this massive fraud?

Why didn't they take more house seats ir secure the senate for themselves?  Were they also in cahoots with all the pollsters too?

And the judges were already involved? Or did they involve them after they knew which were hearing cases?

[IsailedawayfromFR]

The lawyer for the president of the United States has advocated for the execution of a former govt official fired for saying a truth harmful to the presidents political ambitions.

For anyone paying attention, this is the 3rd world stuff you dont want coming to the United states

Treason is the highest form of crime in this country and is subject to execution.

And can you please tell us all how you happen to know this is a 'truth' like you claim?

[Knox27]

Treason is the highest form of crime in this country and is subject to execution.

And can you please tell us all how you happen to know this is a 'truth' like you claim?

There is usually evidence and a trial before the execution though.

And how do I know the truth.  One can never know with total certitude.  But if I look plainly at the facts...

1. A cybersecurity expert working as the head of cybersecurity is an authoritative source.
2.  Not a single person with any proximity to the voting machines, manufacturer, programmer, executive, anyone has given any indication of fraud here
3.  3 weeks after the election and a high powered team of lawyers has gotten absolutely nowhere
4.  Trump outperformed the polling

Let alone the difficulty in coordinating this all.  There are a ton of reasons this is insanely stupid.

Why do you presume to know the truth in not only the absence of evidence, but in fact against all logic

[DCPatriot]

The lawyer for the president of the United States has advocated for the execution of a former govt official fired for saying a truth harmful to the presidents political ambitions.

For anyone paying attention, this is the 3rd world stuff you dont want coming to the United states

Your suggestion is to continue to play "Patty Cake" with them?   /S

Until all Obama appointed/elected judges are also hit... the baptism scene in GODFATHER comes to mind... the courts are merely a wrench in the gears of so-called 'Justice'.

I want my effing country back!   By any means necessary.

[DCPatriot]

There is usually evidence and a trial before the execution though.

And how do I know the truth.  One can never know with total certitude.  But if I look plainly at the facts...

1. A cybersecurity expert working as the head of cybersecurity is an authoritative source.
2.  Not a single person with any proximity to the voting machines, manufacturer, programmer, executive, anyone has given any indication of fraud here
3.  3 weeks after the election and a high powered team of lawyers has gotten absolutely nowhere
4.  Trump outperformed the polling

Let alone the difficulty in coordinating this all.  There are a ton of reasons this is insanely stupid.

Why do you presume to know the truth in not only the absence of evidence, but in fact against all logic

Damnit, @Cyber Liberty   @mystery-ak

Enough is enough, I say!

You need to have new registers take a simple IQ test before you let them post.

[Knox27]

Your suggestion is to continue to play "Patty Cake" with them?   /S

Until all Obama appointed/elected judges are also hit... the baptism scene in GODFATHER comes to mind... the courts are merely a wrench in the gears of so-called 'Justice'.

I want my effing country back!   By any means necessary.

In which country are political opponents are killed, and further non political people are killed for speaking out?

What country do you want back?

[DCPatriot]

In which country are political opponents are killed, and further non political people are killed for speaking out?

What country do you want back?

Your solution is to keep on doing what the GOP has been doing since Dwight D. Eisenhower.  Play nice.  Play by the rules set by the Democrats and their criminal mainstream media.

BOLLOCKS!!

Water the Liberty Tree already!

[Cyber Liberty]

Damnit, @Cyber Liberty   @mystery-ak

Enough is enough, I say!

You need to have new registers take a simple IQ test before you let them post.

@DCPatriot

Well, it's always possible Trump haters can get through the screening process.  We usually leave them as chew toys for the Members, until they become abusive.  Then they go the hard way, like Blutarski.

[DCPatriot]

@DCPatriot

Well, it's always possible Trump haters can get through the screening process.  We usually leave them as chew toys for the Members, until they become abusive.  Then they go the hard way, like Blutarski.

@Cyber Liberty

I have no issues with an opposing POV that is thought out.

Rockefeller Republicans can go straight to hell.  They've had more THREE generations to "get it RIGHT" (pun intended)

Terror has been proven to work for the Muslims as well as for the Bolsheviks.  Time for the so-called media to crap their pants.

Am I extreme?  You betcha!!   I'm 74.  Not on the 'Back Nine', but inside the clubhouse sitting next to the fireplace.   

[Cyber Liberty]

Am I extreme?  You betcha!!   I'm 74.  Not on the 'Back Nine', but inside the clubhouse sitting next to the fireplace.   

Have a Martooni!

[mystery-ak]

I will say this..No one be it Dem or Repub should advocate violence..there are too many nuts out there who will do it!

I like Joe diGenova but he shouldn't have said this.

[Cyber Liberty]

The lawyer for the president of the United States has advocated for the execution of a former govt official fired for saying a truth harmful to the presidents political ambitions.

For anyone paying attention, this is the 3rd world stuff you dont want coming to the United states

Turd-World shitholes do that, yes, and it always starts with stolen elections.  In case you missed it, if the phony election stands we'll already be a Banana Republic.  You are a day late and a dollar short.

Stick around if you don't mind learning the truth.

[Victoria33]

I will say this..No one be it Dem or Repub should advocate violence..there are too many nuts out there who will do it!  I like Joe diGenova but he shouldn't have said this.
[/quote
@mystery-ak
______________________
I was about to post the same thing you said above.  Nut cases may try to kill Chris Krebs (think I have the name right) because Trump's lawyer said it needed to be done.

Nut cases on the other side could say it is okay to kill Trump because Trump's lawyer says it is okay to kill people.

Information on the internet goes around the world.  We need to remember that;  don't give terrorists a US target to eliminate.

[aligncare]

I will say this..No one be it Dem or Repub should advocate violence..there are too many nuts out there who will do it!

I like Joe diGenova but he shouldn't have said this.

That’s not what diGenova said. He was not being literal. It was a turn of phrase that the media, in their usual fashion, took literally for their own propaganda purposes.

People must internalize the reality of the media’s role today. Their job in this tragic comedy is to sow doubt and division, it is to lie and obfuscate the truth about Trump, because they despise him and anyone associated with him. No more complicated than that. The sooner people accept this the better for the republic.

[rustynail]

Such intemperate language!  How can a Principled Conservative abide such an affront?

[catfish1957]

Such intemperate language!  How can a Principled Conservative abide such an affront?

 I'll help you out a bit.....

al·​le·​go·​ry | \ ˈa-lÉ™-ËŒgȯr-Ä“  \
plural allegories
Definition of allegory
1 : the expression by means of symbolic fictional figures and actions of truths or generalizations about human existence
a writer known for his use of allegory
also : an instance (as in a story or painting) of such expression
The poem is an allegory of love and jealousy.
2 : a symbolic representation : EMBLEM sense 2

[corbe]

   More Proof that the Internet is much bigger than just Cat Videos  @Texas Robin

[Polly Ticks]

That’s not what diGenova said. He was not being literal. It was a turn of phrase that the media, in their usual fashion, took literally for their own propaganda purposes.

People must internalize the reality of the media’s role today. Their job in this tragic comedy is to sow doubt and division, it is to lie and obfuscate the truth about Trump, because they despise him and anyone associated with him. No more complicated than that. The sooner people accept this the better for the republic.

Exactly. It was hyperbole.  Nothing different than saying, "I'm so hungry I could eat a horse."

[catfish1957]

Exactly. It was hyperbole.  Nothing different than saying, "I'm so hungry I could eat a horse."

Case in point when the punk POTUS obama in '08 announced that they would bring a gun to knife fight.  Sure didn't hear any outrage on that one.

[aligncare]

I'll help you out a bit.....

al·​le·​go·​ry | \ ˈa-lÉ™-ËŒgȯr-Ä“  \
plural allegories
Definition of allegory
1 : the expression by means of symbolic fictional figures and actions of truths or generalizations about human existence
a writer known for his use of allegory
also : an instance (as in a story or painting) of such expression
The poem is an allegory of love and jealousy.
2 : a symbolic representation : EMBLEM sense 2

I’m never really sure about it, but I think @rustynail doesn’t like using sarcasm tags. Presumably because the comment is self evidentially sarcastic. But, I could be wrong. I never know with the inscrutable rustynail.

[DCPatriot]

I will say this..No one be it Dem or Repub should advocate violence..there are too many nuts out there who will do it!  I like Joe diGenova but he shouldn't have said this.
[/quote
@mystery-ak
______________________
I was about to post the same thing you said above.  Nut cases may try to kill Chris Krebs (think I have the name right) because Trump's lawyer said it needed to be done.

Nut cases on the other side could say it is okay to kill Trump because Trump's lawyer says it is okay to kill people.

Information on the internet goes around the world.  We need to remember that;  don't give terrorists a US target to eliminate.

Are we all supposed to believe that you would lose sleep over POTUS' assassination, now?   /S

[Knox27]

Case in point when the punk POTUS obama in '08 announced that they would bring a gun to knife fight.  Sure didn't hear any outrage on that one.

Ah, it was an idiom.  Just as Obama was not really bringing a literal gun to a literal knife fight, so too is Trump's attorney not saying someone should be literally shot at dawn.

So much like Obama really meant he was going to be adequately prepared for a situation, this guy meant...people who disagree with Trump are merely super wrong.  The guy he named should not be actually shot.  Just never ever say anything against the president.  That was the real message.  No one should interfere with the presidents political ambition.

I mean I sure won't if the presidents attorney publically called for the figurative execution of me if I spoke out of turn.

Thanks for the explanation!  My favorite part is how this isn't a continued rationalization of a deranged man.  That's the best part for sure!