'Without merit': Judge dismisses Trump campaign lawsuit in Pennsylvania
by Jerry Dunleavy, Justice Department Reporter & Zachary Halaschak, Breaking News Reporter |
| November 21, 2020 07:25 PM
| Updated Nov 21, 2020, 08:33 PM
The Trump campaign’s lawsuit seeking to block the certification of Pennsylvania’s election was dismissed with prejudice by a federal court judge on Saturday.
U.S. Middle District of Pennsylvania Judge Matthew Brann made the decision after days of motions filed on both sides and after hearing oral arguments on Tuesday from President Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, who took over the case last week.
In a scathing critique of the legal basis for the case, Brann wrote that Trump’s lawyers “ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters†but “this Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated.â€
“One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens,†Brann ruled. “That has not happened.â€
The judge, an Obama appointee unanimously confirmed by the Senate in 2012, said that the plaintiffs offered “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations.â€
more
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/without-merit-judge-dismisses-trump-campaign-lawsuit-in-pennsylvania