Author Topic: Wisconsin: Legal Updates  (Read 39141 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,469
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #100 on: November 28, 2020, 05:26:35 pm »
Quote
The signature “MLW” was used on the the fake votes.
These initials were found on thousands of “votes” by “indefinitely confined” people.

"MLW" is not a signature.  That alone should have disqualified these ballots.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,227
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #101 on: November 28, 2020, 06:28:12 pm »
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,227
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #102 on: November 29, 2020, 02:44:24 am »
EXCLUSIVE: President Trump Is After the Individual or Individuals Who Voted Illegally in Wisconsin – As Gateway Pundit Exposed Earlier
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/exclusive-president-trump-individual-individuals-voted-illegally-wisconsin-gateway-pundit-exposed-earlier/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,227
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #103 on: December 01, 2020, 01:02:39 am »


Wisconsin formally declares Biden won election following recount
By Julia Manchester - 11/30/20 05:13 PM EST

Wisconsin on Monday formally declared President-elect Joe Biden the winner of the state's presidential contest following a partial recount.

Biden won the Badger State by roughly 20,700 votes, according to Elections Commission Chairwoman Ann Jacobs (D), with Gov. Tony Evers (D) releasing a statement saying he had certified the results.

“Today I carried out my duty to certify the November 3rd election, and as required by state and federal law, I've signed the Certificate of Ascertainment for the slate of electors for President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris,” Evers said. "I want to thank our clerks, election administrators, and poll workers across our state for working tirelessly to ensure we had a safe, fair, and efficient election."

The development comes hours after Arizona officials affirmed Biden as the victor in that state as well.

more
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/528034-wisconsin-formally-declares-biden-won-election-following-recount
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,800
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #104 on: December 01, 2020, 06:59:04 pm »
TRUMP CAMPAIGN FILES LAWSUIT IN WISCONSIN TO RESTORE ELECTION INTEGRITY
Dec 1, 2020

President Donald J. Trump’s re-election campaign filed a lawsuit to the Wisconsin Supreme Court following the campaign's requested recount to uncover fraud and abuse that irrefutably altered the outcome of this election. Today's suit includes four cases with clear evidence of unlawfulness, such as illegally altering absentee ballot envelopes, counting ballots that had no required application, overlooking unlawful claims of indefinite confinement, and holding illegal voting events called Democracy in the Park. These unlawful actions affected no less than approximately 221,000 ballots out of over the three million ballots cast in Wisconsin.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission directed municipal clerks to illegally alter incomplete absentee ballot envelopes contrary to Wisconsin law. Clerks were instructed that they could rely on their own “personal knowledge,” or unspecified “lists or databases at his or her disposal” to add in missing information on returned absentee ballots. Under Wisconsin law, incomplete absentee ballots must be corrected by the voter, and only the voter or they may not be counted.

In another example, municipal clerks issued absentee ballots to voters without requiring the mandatory application, in direct conflict with Wisconsin’s absentee voting safeguards. Wisconsin law expressly requires that absentee ballots may not be issued without receiving a written application requesting the ballot. Despite clear statute, clerks in Madison and Milwaukee issued thousands of absentee ballots without collecting a written application during the two-week in-person absentee voting period that ran from October 20, 2020, through November 1, 2020. 

Voter identification is an essential requirement in Wisconsin to ensure only eligible voters cast ballots. In Madison and Milwaukee, voters were fraudulently permitted by election officials to circumvent voter ID laws and claim an absentee voting status that is only to be used for voters who are indefinitely confined under the circumstances that they are physically ill, infirm, elderly, or disabled. More than 20,000 voters claimed that status and received and returned ballots without providing proper identification and without meeting the requirements for that status, and those ballots should not be counted in accordance with Wisconsin statute.

Finally, the city of Madison created unlawful polling locations at over 200 parks and city locations through their Democracy in the Park voting events. These voting events were held outside of the county’s approved polling locations and did not follow the state’s strict absentee voting requirements. Not only did they not follow the law, but Joe Biden’s campaign encouraged this unlawful voting, advertising these events as opportunities to vote and telling voters to bring their completed ballot to turn in or their incomplete ballot to have a so-called “poll worker” serve as a witness. Voters are not allowed to turn in their absentee ballots anywhere other than the designated polling locations, and any ballots illegally cast there should not be counted.


More: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-files-lawsuit-in-wisconsin-to-restore-election-integrity/

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,800
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #105 on: December 01, 2020, 07:42:29 pm »
Bob Spindell
@BobSpindell


To clarify, today the Wis Elec Com Chair will “make determination” of elect & recount - NOT A “CERTIFICATION” allowing party 5 days to file appeal of this Determination. After resolution of appeal only then can WEC Commissioners meet to certify election. Will keep you informed!


2:22 PM · Nov 30, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

https://twitter.com/BobSpindell/status/1333491712837234691

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,800
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #106 on: December 01, 2020, 11:06:38 pm »
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump


(Ballot transport) Video:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1333873500931690499

3:39 PM · Dec 1, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,800
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #107 on: December 02, 2020, 05:48:58 am »
Donald J. Trump Retweeted
Andrew Havranek
@Andrew_Havranek


The #Wisconsin Supreme Court has ordered @GovEvers to respond to President @realDonaldTrump / @TeamTrump's lawsuit filed this morning, claiming abuse of absentee voting and illegal activity that affected roughly 220,000 ballots.

https://spectrumnews1.com/wi/milwaukee/news/2020/12/01/trump-files-lawsuit-after-wisconsin-recount-confirms-biden-win




4:18 PM · Dec 1, 2020·TweetDeck

https://twitter.com/Andrew_Havranek/status/1333883106001039360

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,227
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #108 on: December 03, 2020, 07:10:56 pm »
Wisconsin high court declines to hear Trump election lawsuit

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A split Wisconsin Supreme Court on Thursday refused to hear President Donald Trump’s lawsuit attempting to overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the battleground state, saying the case must first wind its way through lower courts.

The legal defeat on a 4-3 ruling was the latest in a string of losses for Trump’s post-election lawsuits. Judges in multiple battleground states have rejected his claims of fraud or irregularities. Dissenting conservative justices said the decision would forever “stain” the outcome of the election.

Trump asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to disqualify more than 221,000 ballots in the state’s two biggest Democratic counties, alleging irregularities in the way absentee ballots were administered. His lawsuit echoed claims that were earlier rejected by election officials in those counties during a recount that barely affected Biden’s winning margin of about 20,700 votes.

more
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-wisconsin-lawsuits-2917742813e06908608848410ff41b0c
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,800
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #109 on: December 03, 2020, 08:11:50 pm »
Wisconsin high court declines to hear Trump election lawsuit

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A split Wisconsin Supreme Court on Thursday refused to hear President Donald Trump’s lawsuit attempting to overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the battleground state, saying the case must first wind its way through lower courts.

The legal defeat on a 4-3 ruling was the latest in a string of losses for Trump’s post-election lawsuits. Judges in multiple battleground states have rejected his claims of fraud or irregularities. Dissenting conservative justices said the decision would forever “stain” the outcome of the election.

Trump asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to disqualify more than 221,000 ballots in the state’s two biggest Democratic counties, alleging irregularities in the way absentee ballots were administered. His lawsuit echoed claims that were earlier rejected by election officials in those counties during a recount that barely affected Biden’s winning margin of about 20,700 votes.

more
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-wisconsin-lawsuits-2917742813e06908608848410ff41b0c

Paging Justice Barrett, please pick up the white courtesy phone.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,800
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #110 on: December 11, 2020, 08:06:35 pm »
Quote
Wisconsin judge dismisses Trump campaign’s challenge to state’s election results

The Trump campaign says it will appeal the ruling to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

By Daniel Payne Updated: December 11, 2020 - 12:02pm


 A Wisconsin judge on Friday dismissed the Trump campaign’s legal challenge of state election results, upholding what the judge said was the correct certification of Joe Biden as the winner of the presidential race in Wisconsin.

“The certification of the results of the 2020 Wisconsin presidential election, after the Dane County and Milwaukee County recounts, is affirmed,” Reserve Judge Stephen Simanek said during the virtual hearing.

Simanek said there has been “no credible evidence of any misconduct or wide-scale fraud” in the race.

He said the case turned on whether the recent recounts in Dane and Milwaukee counties “occurred in compliance with the Wisconsin election laws.”

Simanek said petitioners on behalf of Trump’s campaign had not demonstrated that those laws had been violated.

Trump’s legal team brought the case before Simanek after the state’s Supreme Court declined to hear the case before lower courts had ruled on it. The case can now be appealed to the high court.

Trump attorney Jim Troupis said following Simanek’s ruling that the state Supreme Court “is expecting to hear from us shortly.”

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wisconsin-trump-hearing-friday

All moot if the SC does what's right.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,800
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #111 on: December 12, 2020, 05:12:26 am »
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq


NEW: Wisconsin Supreme Court to hear @TeamTrump election integrity case in arguments at noon local time Saturday.




6:29 PM · Dec 11, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1337539993095577605

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,227
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #112 on: December 12, 2020, 03:22:41 pm »
Wisconsin Supreme Court to hear arguments in Trump’s lawsuit seeking to overturn state’s election results
https://www.chicagotribune.com/election-2020/ct-trump-wisconsin-lawsuit-ruling-20201211-if7qllakvvhmfnxwbmyg4th3su-story.html
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,800
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #113 on: December 12, 2020, 06:10:12 pm »
Wisconsin Supreme Court Oral Argument

Live stream: 


Error 404 (Not Found)!!1




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8NT9iBoytE

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,800
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #114 on: December 12, 2020, 06:15:44 pm »
Judges appear to be a wee bit hostile.   :whistle:

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,227
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #115 on: December 13, 2020, 12:19:48 am »
Wisconsin judge, appointed by Trump, dismisses election lawsuit…

A federal judge in Wisconsin on Saturday dismissed a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump against the state elections commission.

 

The judge in the case, Brett Ludwig, who was appointed by Trump to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, held a hearing where the president’s lawyers made their arguments to set aside the result of the state’s popular election.

 

“This is an extraordinary case,” wrote Ludwig in his decision Saturday.

 

“A sitting president who did not prevail in his bid for reelection has asked for federal court help in setting aside the popular vote based on disputed issues of election administration, issues he plainly could have raised before the vote occurred.”

 

“This Court has allowed plaintiff the chance to make his case and he has lost on the merits,” the judge wrote. In his reply brief, plaintiff ‘asks that the Rule of Law be followed’ …. It has been,” the judge continued.

more
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/wisconsin-judge-appointed-by-trump-dismisses-election-lawsuit/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,469
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #116 on: December 13, 2020, 03:40:18 am »
Quote
In his reply brief, plaintiff ‘asks that the Rule of Law be followed’ …. It has been,” the judge continued.

I didn't realize that ballot stuffing was legal in Wisconsin.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2020, 06:21:02 pm by Hoodat »
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Online Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56,711
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #117 on: December 13, 2020, 10:17:09 am »
[quoteIn his reply brief, plaintiff ‘asks that the Rule of Law be followed’ …. It has been,” the judge continued.


I didn't realize that ballot stuffing was legal in Wisconsin.
If there IS no rule of law, then the case can be made that any act follows it.

The statement "...set aside the popular vote..." implies that the judge does not understand that there is no popular vote when those numbers are tainted by fraud. What the electorate would have chosen is unknown: there is nothing to set aside. The ruling is made on a flawed and prejudicial premise, namely that the tabulation of votes is accurate and true. With assertions of fraud, that is not a given.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,469
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #118 on: December 13, 2020, 06:20:40 pm »
From 2016 to 2020, Trump increased his net total over his Democrat opponent in 50 of Wisconsin's 72 counties.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,227
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #119 on: December 14, 2020, 05:01:39 pm »
Zeke Miller
@ZekeJMiller
·
1m
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Supreme Court rules against Trump’s attempt to overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the state.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,746
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #120 on: December 15, 2020, 01:51:24 am »
BREAKING: Wisconsin Supreme Court says election officials were wrong; ballots may not be counted

The opinion, which was released this morning, says local elections officials were wrong to suggest that voters could claim the status of "indefinitely confined" based on COVID-19. The majority decision also held that if voters falsely claimed they were indefinitely confined "their ballots would not count."

UPDATE: In a separate challenge, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has tossed President Trump’s case.

MADISON — The Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Mark Jefferson and the Republican Party of Wisconsin.

The opinion, which was released this morning, says local election officials were wrong to suggest that voters could claim the status of “indefinitely confined” based on COVID-19. The majority decision also held that if voters falsely claimed they were indefinitely confined “their ballots would not count.”

But the court noted that a determination must be make in every case before tossing a ballot.

In a separate suit, President Trump has sought seek to invalidate all votes cast under the special status. In a second ruling released today, the court said the President was in error to ask that all ballots cast under the special status be tossed.

Under Wisconsin law, a voter may receive a ballot by mail and bypass Wisconsin’s voter ID law, if the voter, by his own determination, concludes he “confined” based on age, physical illness, or infirmity. This fall, roughly 215,000 voters in Wisconsin said they were indefinitely confined, nearly a four-fold increase from the 2016 election.

The court said the government’s interpretation of Wisconsin’s indefinitely confined was erroneous. “A county clerk may not “declare” that any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic,” the court said. The court further stated that, “…the presence of a communicable disease such as COVID-19, in and of itself, does not entitle all electors [voters] in Wisconsin to obtain an absentee ballot…”


https://electionwiz.com/2020/12/14/breaking-wisconsin-supreme-court-says-election-officials-were-wrong-ballots-may-not-be-counted/amp/
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,183
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #121 on: December 15, 2020, 02:29:50 am »
BREAKING: Wisconsin Supreme Court says election officials were wrong; ballots may not be counted

LOL!

For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,800
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #122 on: December 15, 2020, 04:26:26 am »
Wisconsin Supreme Court rules state erred by giving blanket exemption to voter ID rules during COVID
Ruling opens door to challenge potentially tens of thousands of ballots in state where difference between Biden, Trump is just about 20,000 votes.
Just the News, Dec 14, 2020

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Monday that state and local election officials erred when they gave blanket permission allowing voters to declare themselves homebound and skip voter ID requirements in the 2020 election, potentially opening the door for Republicans to challenge tens of thousand of ballots.

More: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-state-erred-giving-blanket-exemption-voter


Online Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56,711
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #123 on: December 15, 2020, 03:53:25 pm »
Wisconsin Supreme Court rules state erred by giving blanket exemption to voter ID rules during COVID
Ruling opens door to challenge potentially tens of thousands of ballots in state where difference between Biden, Trump is just about 20,000 votes.
Just the News, Dec 14, 2020

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Monday that state and local election officials erred when they gave blanket permission allowing voters to declare themselves homebound and skip voter ID requirements in the 2020 election, potentially opening the door for Republicans to challenge tens of thousand of ballots.

More: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-state-erred-giving-blanket-exemption-voter
Nice to know all those gubmint employees are right on it.

The "useless eaters" at the public trough aren't all on welfare..
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,171
Re: Wisconsin: Legal Updates
« Reply #124 on: December 15, 2020, 04:08:58 pm »
Wisconsin Supreme Court rules state erred by giving blanket exemption to voter ID rules during COVID
Ruling opens door to challenge potentially tens of thousands of ballots in state where difference between Biden, Trump is just about 20,000 votes.
Just the News, Dec 14, 2020

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Monday that state and local election officials erred when they gave blanket permission allowing voters to declare themselves homebound and skip voter ID requirements in the 2020 election, potentially opening the door for Republicans to challenge tens of thousand of ballots.

More: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-state-erred-giving-blanket-exemption-voter

See now this is something... is there enough time?