Stacey Abrams: ‘More Than 600,000’ Georgians Already Requested Mail Ballots for Runoff Election

[mystery-ak]

From Phone Banking to Fundraising, Hollywood Celebs Go All in to Flip Georgia Senate Seats

Ben Kew15 Nov 2020491
3:56

Some of Hollywood’s most vocal leftists continue to go all in for the upcoming Georgia Senate election, with efforts to call up voters and fundraising campaigns in the hope of flipping both seats from Republican to Democrat in the runoff election in January.

In the first of the two races, Republican David Purdue gained the most vote, but did not achieve the necessary threshold to defeat his opponent Jon Ossoff. Meanwhile, Democrat Raphael Warnock received the most votes in the other race, with incumbent Republican Kelly Loeffler coming in second. Both races were open primaries, with the vote splitting among various alternative candidates particularly in the second race, where no candidate won more than 35 percent of the vote.

Last week, Breitbart News reported that Hollywood stars were pushing a left-wing group called Win Both Seats that aims to elect U.S. Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock. Win Both Seats is backed by Stacey Abrams, actor Kumail Nanjiani, actress Sophia Bush, former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang and, Black Lives Matters co-founders Patrisse Cullors and Alicia Garza.

Now, with both elections scheduled for January, celebrities including Debra Messing, Amy Schumer, John Leguizamo, Alyssa Milano, Billy Eichner, Rosanna Arquette, Yventte Nicole Brown and Piper Perabo are going all out in their attempts to win the seats for Ossoff and Warnock.

therealdebramessing's profile picture
therealdebramessing
Verified
🌟G E O R G I A 🌟

The 2020 Election ISN’T OVER for you!

BOTH Senate races are going to a RUNOFF!

It’s 🇺🇸 January 5, 2021 🇺🇸

ORDER YOUR ABSENTEE BALLOT TODAY!

🔥ballotrequest.sos.ga.gov

This election is URGENT.

If @jonossoff & @reverendraphaelwarnock WIN their

more
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/11/15/from-phone-banking-to-fundraising-hollywood-celebs-go-all-in-to-flip-georgia-senate-seats/#

[mystery-ak]

Stacey Abrams: ‘More Than 600,000’ Georgians Already Requested Mail Ballots for Runoff Election

Kyle Morris 15 Nov 2020

Failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams announced Sunday that “more than 600,000 Georgians have requested their mail ballots” for the Senate runoff elections on January 5, urging her followers to support the Democrat candidates.

“More than 600,000 Georgians have requested their mail ballots for the January 5 runoff elections,” Abrams wrote in a tweet Sunday morning. “Help elect @ReverendWarnock and @ossoff to the U.S. Senate by requesting your ballot today.”

Stacey Abrams
@staceyabrams
BREAKING: More than 600,000 Georgians have requested their mail ballots for the January 5 runoff elections.

Help elect @ReverendWarnock and @ossoff to the U.S. Senate by requesting your ballot today
➡️
 http://ballotrequest.sos.ga.gov. Happy voting and let’s get it done... again. #gapol

more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/15/stacey-abrams-more-than-600000-georgians-already-requested-mail-ballots-for-runoff-election/

[mystery-ak]

They are in the process of stealing it..why not no one gets punished...

[GtHawk]

How many of those requests were from dead or illegal voters?

[skeeter]

So much for ‘thank G-d we still have the senate’. How naive.

Unless the flaccid gop does something and fast this election is already lost.

[cato potatoe]

How many of those requests were from dead or illegal voters?

I'm sure that many of them are from residents of other states.  Brian Kemp is turning his state into a laughingstock.

[mystery-ak]

I'm sure that many of them are from residents of other states.  Brian Kemp is turning his state into a laughingstock.

My guess is Hollywood...

[Hoodat]

Stacey Abrams: ‘More Than 600,000’ Georgians Already Requested Mail Ballots for Runoff Election

And over two-thirds of them don't even know it.

[HighlyEsteemedSir]

They are in the process of stealing it..why not no one gets punished...

I blame the fecklessness of the Republican party.  They control the state legislature there.  Just as Republican state legislatures failed to intervene prior to the election when Article II confers power exclusively to the legislature concerning state election laws, I see no reason to believe they won't fail to act in any significant manner.

Can it really be said that Republicans are hungry for power since when they have it, they fail to exert it even in cases where the law unquestionably gives them the authority?

[Hoodat]

Can it really be said that Republicans are hungry for power since when they have it, they fail to exert it even in cases where the law unquestionably gives them the authority?

As proponents for limited government, by definition Conservatives have no hunger for power.  Democrats are the opposite, which is why they usually win these types of battles.

But in the case of Georgia, we are stuck with a petty corrupt governor who doesn't give a damn about what hurts the Republican Party or the people in general.  His objective now is to prove that Dominion voting machines are flawless, and he has orchestrated a recount procedure that will do exactly that.

[HighlyEsteemedSir]

As proponents for limited government, by definition Conservatives have no hunger for power.  Democrats are the opposite, which is why they usually win these types of battles.

But in the case of Georgia, we are stuck with a petty corrupt governor who doesn't give a damn about what hurts the Republican Party or the people in general.  His objective now is to prove that Dominion voting machines are flawless, and he has orchestrated a recount procedure that will do exactly that.

Principled conservatives should not be motivated by power - I agree, but I see very few Republicans I would consider truly conservative who hold elected office.  The legislature, in this case, can still pass resolutions that do not require the Governors signature. The constitution is broad under Article II in the case of the legislature, but narrow in the sense that it supplies this power exclusively to the legislative body.  The Governor should not be, under any circumstances concerning state elections, a factor that inhibits the legislature from acting.   

[Hoodat]

The Georgia General Assembly cannot legally convene until Jan 4 of next year.

[HighlyEsteemedSir]

The Georgia General Assembly cannot legally convene until Jan 4 of next year.

In several states, Washington for instance, the assembly can be convened for emergency reasons.  In their case for "catastrophic incidents".  Does no similar provision exist in GA?  At a cursory glance, this sounds absurd that the Governor can act in unilateral dictatorial fashion, but the legislature cannot exercise powers granted to it by the constitution. 

Even if no such inhibition exists, I suspect they would fail to do anything.   

[cato potatoe]

Yes, the governor could call a special session.  He has expressly refused to do it.

[Hoodat]

Yes, the governor could call a special session.  He has expressly refused to do it.

Correctamundo.

[christian]

Proclaim a run off, then send in U.S. marshall's to rigidly enforce the laws and rules that must be abided by.  When stated abdicate their responsibilities to run a legitimate and fair election, they must step aside and let the adults do their jobs for them.  Enforce the laws against law breakers with harsh consequences.  Its amazing how you can get compliance that way.  Put the fear of God/consequences in them.  Government is NOT entitled to run like a criminal enterprise.

[Cyber Liberty]

In several states, Washington for instance, the assembly can be convened for emergency reasons.  In their case for "catastrophic incidents".  Does no similar provision exist in GA?  At a cursory glance, this sounds absurd that the Governor can act in unilateral dictatorial fashion, but the legislature cannot exercise powers granted to it by the constitution. 

Even if no such inhibition exists, I suspect they would fail to do anything.   

I believe the Governor is acting under "Emergency Authority" since March or so.  GA may weasel out of this.

[roamer_1]

Proclaim a run off, then send in U.S. marshall's to rigidly enforce the laws and rules that must be abided by.  When stated abdicate their responsibilities to run a legitimate and fair election, they must step aside and let the adults do their jobs for them.  Enforce the laws against law breakers with harsh consequences.  Its amazing how you can get compliance that way.  Put the fear of God/consequences in them.  Government is NOT entitled to run like a criminal enterprise.

Federal marshals have no jurisdiction in state election matters.

[christian]

Overthrowing elections and fraudulently conducting elections is breaching the rights to elect a President.  Thieving state politicians rights is state jurisdiction, thieving Federal election rights becomes another matter.  The 'right' to thieve and deny representation in and of federal government becomes a Federal  violation.  I know of no Conservative with the position of 'rights to thieve votes', but plenty of democrats/hardcore liberals do.

[roamer_1]

Overthrowing elections and fraudulently conducting elections is breaching the rights to elect a President.  Thieving state politicians rights is state jurisdiction, thieving Federal election rights becomes another matter.  The 'right' to thieve and deny representation in and of federal government becomes a Federal  violation.  I know of no Conservative with the position of 'rights to thieve votes', but plenty of democrats/hardcore liberals do.

Prove it. Prove ANY of it. With actual proof that would stand in an actual court.

Only a statist would be so cavalier as to demand the all powerful federal government roll in and overtake sovereign states. And that without a whit of proof... But it MUST be true, right? After all you heard it on the internet. 

[Hoodat]

Prove it. Prove ANY of it. With actual proof that would stand in an actual court.

Only a statist would be so cavalier as to demand the all powerful federal government roll in and overtake sovereign states. And that without a whit of proof... But it MUST be true, right? After all you heard it on the internet. 

Here in Georgia, there are (were) three primary exhibits of evidence.  First would be the signatures on mail-in ballot envelopes that did not match the signatures of the voters.  These were never checked in Fulton, Cobb, Dekalb, Gwinnett, Clayton, Clark, or Muscogee Counties.  This evidence has since been destroyed - ballots permanently separated from the bar-coded envelopes that delivered them.

Second would be the residency of the mail-in voter.  These were also not checked, and are not being checked for the runoff election either.

Third would be discrepancies in the machine vote totals generated during the original election count.  These discrepancies themselves have been documented, but are not being reviewed as part of the recount.  If a vote flipped or was erased during the original count, it will likewise be flipped or erased during the recount.

So yes, the evidence is there.  But it simply doesn't count for anything.  The only purpose of the recount is to confirm the original count and remove any suspicion from the Governor and Secretary of State regarding the Dominion voting machines and all payola associated with that.

[Cyber Liberty]

Prove it. Prove ANY of it. With actual proof that would stand in an actual court.

Only a statist would be so cavalier as to demand the all powerful federal government roll in and overtake sovereign states. And that without a whit of proof... But it MUST be true, right? After all you heard it on the internet. 

Has anybody pointed out yet that this is not the appropriate time to "show the evidence?"  That would be when the suits hit the Judges and not before, to keep the other side from hiding or destroying evidence.  To declare we're all wet because that hasn't happened yet is not a very fair tactic to use.  (I'm sure you will deny that's what you meant, and that's fine.  )

[roamer_1]

Here in Georgia, there are (were) three primary exhibits of evidence.  First would be the signatures on mail-in ballot envelopes that did not match the signatures of the voters.  These were never checked in Fulton, Cobb, Dekalb, Gwinnett, Clayton, Clark, or Muscogee Counties.  This evidence has since been destroyed - ballots permanently separated from the bar-coded envelopes that delivered them.

Second would be the residency of the mail-in voter.  These were also not checked, and are not being checked for the runoff election either.

Third would be discrepancies in the machine vote totals generated during the original election count.  These discrepancies themselves have been documented, but are not being reviewed as part of the recount.  If a vote flipped or was erased during the original count, it will likewise be flipped or erased during the recount.

So yes, the evidence is there.  But it simply doesn't count for anything.  The only purpose of the recount is to confirm the original count and remove any suspicion from the Governor and Secretary of State regarding the Dominion voting machines and all payola associated with that.

Not very long ago, you were certain the difference would be made apparent by a simple recount, because of the 100s of thousands of votes that were switched electronically (which would not effect the physical ballots). Now your recount must be going the wrong way... because those 100s of thousands of electronically switched votes are not materializing... 

[roamer_1]

Has anybody pointed out yet that this is not the appropriate time to "show the evidence?"  That would be when the suits hit the Judges and not before, to keep the other side from hiding or destroying evidence.  To declare we're all wet because that hasn't happened yet is not a very fair tactic to use.  (I'm sure you will deny that's what you meant, and that's fine.  )

Sure and you're right... But there are no piles of indictments getting served... no court challenges that are rising to challenge (at least not in the kind of numbers y'all believe...)

The only challenge left that could possibly bear fruit of that magnitude is the supposed seizure of Dominion servers over in Germany - And I don't even know if that's even true!

I am actually ON YOUR SIDE wrt this I WANT corruption exposed. But there has to be evidence. Not just hopped up internet blathering. Show me something that rises above the level of gossip.

[Cyber Liberty]

Sure and you're right... But there are no piles of indictments getting served... no court challenges that are rising to challenge (at least not in the kind of numbers y'all believe...)

The only challenge left that could possibly bear fruit of that magnitude is the supposed seizure of Dominion servers over in Germany - And I don't even know if that's even true!

I am actually ON YOUR SIDE wrt this I WANT corruption exposed. But there has to be evidence. Not just hopped up internet blathering. Show me something that rises above the level of gossip.

I knew that!