You're misunderstanding my comment. I am certainly not suggesting that Trump supporters are as a general rule technologically naive. As I said a few posts back, I am a Trump supporter and don't consider myself technologically naive (I have several degrees in a field of engineering). I was specifically referring to Sydney Powell, who said she was relying on what others told be because she didn't understand the math. at the time she was referring to this professor Shiva, who was positing a theory you don't hear about anymore because it was laughably wrong. Basically he had created graphs of what was effectively Y-X versus X, and then was claiming that the fact that these graphs all had a perfect slope of -1 was evidence of fraud. I've seen this guy before, and he's a complete buffoon. He goes around claiming to be the Inventor of email (he's not). The only reason Sydney fell for this is because math and technology are not her strong suit. Hence the comment. She's a brilliant lawyer, just neither a mathematician nor a related vocation that involves a lot of math (I.e. an engineer or scientist).
You are twisting this comment to imply I was asserting that all Trump supporters are technologically naive. You can deny it, but it's obvious. It's petty, and small-minded. Exactly the kind of nonsense that is why I am here instead of FR.
I have no denial of anything I have said and after consideration am willing to let this one go firstly because I believe you are a conservative and secondly us engineers are the superior beings on this forum, especially when it comes up against lawyers(Laugh intended).
I believe the soundness of what Sydney originally expressed that the machines have been manipulated to produce results other than simply tabulation of votes. This has been more than verified by the very few audits of the machines Republicans have been allowed to examine. I am unsure how many machines have been audited thoroughly but it would not surprise me any if there have been ANY machines thoroughly audited which actually did not have 'errors'.
She has had some hyperbole which may simply be some over-dramatic expression intended to make any criminals think long and hard prior to certification of voting occurs. To that, she likely failed to stymie the theft.
So let's go about our business of restoring this republic by ensuring politicians do not get elected by criminal means, pursue all legal remedies that elections follow the law and to find and convict all perpetrators of election malfeasance.
