Yes you did.
Someone without bias cannot possibly be a moral human being, therefore is godless.
A law can never cover 100% of all situations. If it did, we just need robots to judge us, not people.
The moral character of a judge is absolutely required to be a prudent jurist.
Perhaps our disagreement on this issue may stem from the definition of the words "biased" and "morality".
Who defines morality? A person could possibly be on trial for DWI, but moral in all other aspects of their life. Could they not? But they still broke the law.
If a judge imposes their own "biases" in rendering a decision. For the sake of argument let's say...the DWI person above is before a judge that has an extreme bias against drinking...for any reason. So the decision of that judge might be colored by bias.
Bias does not equal morality or godlyness. But it can very often cause legal counsel to get a judge that will be more sympathetic to their case. Or in the case of the prosecution...to seek a judge that will rule in a harder fashion. It happens all the time. IMHO...the judge should administer the law.