You still gave no solutions. Crying doom and gloom is not a solution. Sitting in a burning house and lamenting about is not a solution.
Covince me what we need to do, or what needs to happen. I am open to suggestions.....
Trump would have to resign. Pence would have to take the lead. I will vote for him. I will not vote for Trump
Here is an example:
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
·
15h
New York City and Chicago play the Sanctuary City card,
where criminals are protected. Perhaps they will have to start changing their ways (and thinking!).
Yet...………………
Gangster Disciples boss Larry Hoover seeks break on prison time under law Kanye West championed
Two of the Chicago gang kingpin’s lieutenants already have been freed from prison under the First Step Act that the rapper famously urged President Donald Trump to sign.
By Frank Main and Jon Seidel Mar 20, 2020, 5:30am CDT
https://chicago.suntimes.com/politics/2020/3/20/21184373/gangster-disciples-larry-hoover-prison-first-step-act-kanye-west-donald-trumpNY Criminals' Early Release Threatens Public Safety
https://www.newsmax.com/alfonsedamato/criminals-early-release-new-york-bail-reform-act/2019/12/16/id/946160/New York Jailbreak Law to Free Suspects Accused of Manslaughter, Negligent Homicide, Child Sex Crimes
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/18/new-york-jailbreak-law-to-free-suspects-accused-of-manslaughter-negligent-homicide-child-sex-crimes/Kanye West BLM
Trump is literally complaining about himself.
More specifically relating to Trumps tweet:
Immigration Enforcement Concerns Raised by the Bill
Title I Concerns. First, there is nothing prohibiting federal prisoners who are excludable or deportable aliens from participating in the recidivism reduction programs in Title I of the bill — which does address inadmissible or deportable aliens, but only to specify that they cannot accrue "good time" reductions; otherwise, except as noted below, they are indistinguishable from other prisoners for purposes of eligibility or participation.4
Second, though the bill specifically categorizes certain prisoners who may not participate in the programs, they are prohibited on the basis of the crimes for which they are incarcerated, and not on the basis of excludability or deportability under the immigration laws. This leads to some significant logistical and methodological flaws in the logic of the bill.5 Here are a few examples.
Prisoners who have been convicted of peonage/slavery/human trafficking laws are generally prohibited from participating in the reform programs (see line 23, p. 14 – line 2, p. 15) unless the convictions were for violations of:
18 U.S.C. Section 1592, which has to do with unlawfully holding or destroying passports or identity documents with the intention of keeping an individual in a state of bondage. Some of the more egregious cases of bondage prosecuted by U.S. attorneys in recent years have been of wealthy individuals, often aliens themselves, who hold their foreign servants or employees hostage and in conditions of peonage by keeping their passports, among other things.6 Yet such individuals, if convicted only under this statute, would be entitled to enter such "recidivist reduction" programs.
18 U.S.C. Section 1593A, which has to do with persons who profit from peonage, slavery, or trafficking in humans. Why should acting as a middle-man slaver and trafficker who profits from moving victims into bondage not on its face be a disqualifier, particularly given the active involvement of alien cartel and transnational gang members who operate on both sides of the Mexico-U.S. Border?7
18 U.S.C. Section 1594, which involves attempts or conspiracies to engage in criminal acts of peonage, slavery, and trafficking — including for offenses that would themselves be a cause for disqualification. Does it make sense that one who attempts or conspires to violate such a law would be entitled to participate in these prisoner "reform" programs?
18 U.S.C. Section 1596, which authorizes extraterritorial jurisdiction for federal peonage, slavery, and human trafficking offenses. It defies logic that such individuals should be entitled to preferential participation in recidivist reduction and other programs.
All of these specific exclusions from the disqualifying offenses, which leave the offenders (including deportable and excludable aliens) free to participate in reduction programs, are both puzzling and troubling.
https://dailycaller.com/2020/04/13/booker-jayapal-immigrant-detainees-coronavirus-first-act/Trump is a sanctuary for illegal alien prisoners. Sad. And he follows up during COVID by having AG Bar determine that prisons can use their discretion on releasing criminals to keep them from getting COVID.
