The Best Argument For President Trump's Re-Election

[mrclose]

Charlie Kirk gives a 'fire hose' list of reasons Trump is so effective. 

[roamer_1]

TRILLIONS UPON TRILLIONS of reasons not to.

[EdinVA]

 

[aligncare]

[Chosen Daughter]

There isn't any.

[mrclose]

TRILLIONS UPON TRILLIONS of reasons not to.

And it would be different with a dim?
How?

Pelosi wants three trillion even now!

You gotta do better!

[roamer_1]

And it would be different with a dim?
How?

Pelosi wants three trillion even now!

You gotta do better!

You may not have noticed, but I ain't voting for the Democrat either.
No, I do not have to do better. There ain't a damn thing he's done that compares to his ability to spend us into the poorhouse.

[aligncare]

All us Trump supporters (we spawns of Satan) have made these arguments—not nearly with such brevity or precision as Kirk has done here. But, we’ve all tried our best, only to be met by emotional counter arguments. “I don’t like the way he talks,” “He’s so unpresidential,” “He’s a racist,” “He hates immigrants,” on and on.

A point some of his harshest critics here should keep in mind and give a good ponder:

If you find yourself making the same arguments as CNN, MSNBC and Adam Schiff, it’s time to question your assumptions and purpose. You might be a democrat.

[roamer_1]

All us Trump supporters (we spawns of Satan) have made these arguments—not nearly with such brevity or precision as Kirk has done here. But, we’ve all tried our best, only to be met by emotional counter arguments. “I don’t like the way he talks,” “He’s so unpresidential,” “He’s a racist,” “He hates immigrants,” on and on.

A point some of his harshest critics here should keep in mind and give a good ponder:

If you find yourself making the same arguments as CNN, MSNBC and Adam Schiff, it’s time to question your assumptions and purpose. You might be a democrat.

If you can't see the emotionalism in that vid, it might be you who should reconsider.
And my argument has been the spending and nearly only the spending for some time, because it is all one should need, and because it is not emotional. Strictly by the numbers, it's all about the Benjamins.

And in that alone Tumpy has failed so completely as to put our grandchildren, maybe even great grandchildren into servitude. Unconscionable and utterly unforgivable.

[aligncare]

If you can't see the emotionalism in that vid, it might be you who should reconsider.
And my argument has been the spending and nearly only the spending for some time, because it is all one should need, and because it is not emotional. Strictly by the numbers, it's all about the Benjamins.

And in that alone Tumpy has failed so completely as to put our grandchildren, maybe even great grandchildren into servitude. Unconscionable and utterly unforgivable.

Here’s a shock for you, I disagree. Kirk rattled off facts. Not one thing he said was untrue. Trump faced unrelenting opposition and yes, persecution by the most powerful forces of stasis in America: the Washington elite personal get-rich-quick entrenched establishment. I’d like to see you manage the transformations of government that Trump has accomplished in three short years. Oh, that’s right, you can’t. All you can do is throw stones.

If you like the “Kingdom of DC” don’t vote for Trump in November. Your prerogative.

[EdinVA]

If you can't see the emotionalism in that vid, it might be you who should reconsider.
And my argument has been the spending and nearly only the spending for some time, because it is all one should need, and because it is not emotional. Strictly by the numbers, it's all about the Benjamins.

And in that alone Tumpy has failed so completely as to put our grandchildren, maybe even great grandchildren into servitude. Unconscionable and utterly unforgivable.

Not all of us are machines.  Some of us have emotions especially when we believe in something.
IT everything else was good (no wars, no socialists trying to take over, no threats to the constitution, closed borders, etc) then yes, the money is top priority. 

We just disagree on where the greatest threat to the future of the country is and like it or not, Trump is the greatest ally we have in the preservation of our society.

[roamer_1]

Here’s a shock for you, I disagree. Kirk rattled off facts. Not one thing he said was untrue. Trump faced unrelenting opposition and yes, persecution by the most powerful forces of stasis in America: the Washington elite personal get-rich-quick entrenched establishment. I’d like to see you manage the transformations of government that Trump has accomplished in three short years. Oh, that’s right, you can’t. All you can do is throw stones.

If you like the “Kingdom of DC” don’t vote for Trump in November. Your prerogative.

Right... Facts or a martyr complex. The ol persecution con... So friggin what? You gotts to vote for him because the other guys are meanies? For cryin out loud.

And what transformation? The one that costs way more in four years than his liberal predecessor spent in eight? That sounds like big.gov on crack to me, no matter what the spinmeisters say.

And no, I won't be voting for Tumpy for King of DC... The only difference I can see is whose a$$ is on the golden throne.

Show me the friggin money.

[catfish1957]

Best argument for Trump re-election?



Trump Pence 2020!!!!!

[roamer_1]

Not all of us are machines.  Some of us have emotions especially when we believe in something.
IT everything else was good (no wars, no socialists trying to take over, no threats to the constitution, closed borders, etc) then yes, the money is top priority. 

We just disagree on where the greatest threat to the future of the country is and like it or not, Trump is the greatest ally we have in the preservation of our society.

I see that entirely differently - I see him as the greatest threat. All y'all are in effect, literally taking the money off the table. Kickin out the chocks and giving the beast all it will ever need.

A dire mistake of epic proportions. And I will be proven right in that.

[aligncare]

Right... Facts or a martyr complex. The ol persecution con... So friggin what? You gotts to vote for him because the other guys are meanies? For cryin out loud.

And what transformation? The one that costs way more in four years than his liberal predecessor spent in eight? That sounds like big.gov on crack to me, no matter what the spinmeisters say.

And no, I won't be voting for Tumpy for King of DC... The only difference I can see is whose a$$ is on the golden throne.

Show me the friggin money.

At least get the name right. It’s not Trumpy, it’s ‘spawn of Satan’.

We’re done.

[Cyber Liberty]

 

[roamer_1]

At least get the name right. It’s not Trumpy, it’s ‘spawn of Satan’.

We’re done.

persecution complex complete.

 

[bilo]

All us Trump supporters (we spawns of Satan) have made these arguments—not nearly with such brevity or precision as Kirk has done here. But, we’ve all tried our best, only to be met by emotional counter arguments. “I don’t like the way he talks,” “He’s so unpresidential,” “He’s a racist,” “He hates immigrants,” on and on.

A point some of his harshest critics here should keep in mind and give a good ponder:

If you find yourself making the same arguments as CNN, MSNBC and Adam Schiff, it’s time to question your assumptions and purpose. You might be a democrat.

Wow!

Well said.

FWIW, my response to all the emotional reasons to not support Trump is what policies has he pursued that are not in America's best interest.

[aligncare]

Wow!

Well said.

FWIW, my response to all the emotional reasons to not support Trump is what policies has he pursued that are not in America's best interest.

Some people seem to think Trump writes the spending bills and can dictate to the legislature what measures to put in or leave out. According to them, it’s all about the Benjamin’s...all of a sudden—when it’s Trump.

[roamer_1]

Some people seem to think Trump writes the spending bills and can dictate to the legislature what measures to put in or leave out. According to them, it’s all about the Benjamin’s...all of a sudden—when it’s Trump.

When have I not defended fiscal conservatism? That's a wholly disingenuous charge.

[roamer_1]

Wow!

Well said.

FWIW, my response to all the emotional reasons to not support Trump is what policies has he pursued that are not in America's best interest.

The ones that cost what, THREE TIMES MORE than has ever been spent before in the history of mankind?

But, but, butt... Look at all the CANDY he's throwin! 

[bilo]

Some people seem to think Trump writes the spending bills and can dictate to the legislature what measures to put in or leave out. According to them, it’s all about the Benjamin’s...all of a sudden—when it’s Trump.

The Pubs have been pounded on their heads for years for being uncaring because they were attempting to be fiscally responsible. Until the Rats get serious about fiscal restraint it makes no sense to try and fix the problem.

[Free Vulcan]

We've already spent ourselves into oblivion thanks to Congress and the Presidency. That cake was baked by the time Obama left office.

While Trump hasn't helped, we've seen nothing like the nation-ending virulent and voilent radicalism the commie leftist Dems want to visit upon us.

If my only option is to delay that for 4 more years, then I'll gladly vote Trump.

[bilo]

We've already spent ourselves into oblivion thanks to Congress and the Presidency. That cake was baked by the time Obama left office.

While Trump hasn't helped, we've seen nothing like the nation-ending virulent and voilent radicalism the commie leftist Dems want to visit upon us.

If my only option is to delay that for 4 more years, then I'll gladly vote Trump.

 

Also, as Kirk correctly points out Trump has done a lot of great things.

[Cyber Liberty]

We got an autographed copy of Charlie Kirk's latest book as a gift from a fellow who was running for National Committeeman from AZ.  He won the election at the State Convention a couple weeks ago.