Author Topic: WHO Official Says She Suspected Human-To-Human COVID-19 Transmission ‘Right From The Start’ — But Th  (Read 389 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 385,024
  • Let's Go Brandon!
WHO Official Says She Suspected Human-To-Human COVID-19 Transmission ‘Right From The Start’ — But The WHO Echoed Misleading Chinese Claims To The Contrary For Weeks



   

Peter Hasson
Editor
April 13, 2020 9:37 PM ET

A World Health Organization official said Monday that she suspected human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus “right from the start,” beginning on Dec. 31, 2019.

But WHO officials echoed Chinese authorities and denied any suggestion of human-to-human transmission for weeks after Dec. 31. Chinese doctors, meanwhile, were reported to have known for weeks prior that the virus could be transmitted between humans.

“Right from the start, from the first notification we received on the 31st of December, given that this was a cluster of pneumonia — I’m a MERS specialist, so my background is in coronaviruses and influenza — so immediately thought, given that this is a respiratory pathogen, that of course there may be human-to-human transmission,” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove said in a press briefing Monday.

more
https://dailycaller.com/2020/04/13/world-health-organization-human-transmission-timeline-china-covid19-coronavirus/
« Last Edit: April 14, 2020, 05:11:02 pm by mystery-ak »
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,421
I won't say this is an "Earth-shattering Kaboom", but when links/dates in that article are meshed with pronouncements from China:

Wuhan Municipal Health Commission claimed no evidence of human-human transmission or infected medical staff: December 31, 2019, http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2019123108989  (Chinese language, second paragraph)

Wuhan Municipal Health Commission claimed no evidence of human-human transmission or infected medical staff: January 3, 2020, http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2020010309017  (Chinese language)

Wuhan Municipal Health Commission claimed no evidence of human-human transmission or infected medical staff: January 5, 2020, http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2020010509020  (Chinese language)

Wuhan Municipal Health Commission claimed no evidence of human-human transmission or infected medical staff: January 11, 2020, http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2020011109035  (Chinese language)

WHO claimed "no clear evidence of human to human transmission": January 12, 2020, https://www.who.int/csr/don/12-january-2020-novel-coronavirus-china/en/

WHO claimed "there has been no suggestion of human to human transmission of this new coronavirus": January 13, 2020, https://www.who.int/thailand/news/detail/13-01-2020-thailand-responding-to-the-novel-coronavirus

Wuhan Municipal Health Commission claimed no cases among related contacts: January 14, 2020, http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2020011409039  (Chinese language)

WHO claimed "there is no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission": January 14, 2020, https://www.who.int/csr/don/14-january-2020-novel-coronavirus-thailand-ex-china/en/

Wuhan Municipal Health Commission claimed "there is no clear evidence of person-to-person transmission" but "the possibility of limited person-to-person transmission cannot be ruled out": January 15, 2020, http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2020011509040  (Chinese language, Google Translate translation)

Wuhan Municipal Health Commission claimed no cases among related contacts: January 17, 2020, http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2020011809064  (Chinese language)

China and WHO claim that how the virus is transmitted is unknown: January 19, 2020, https://www.bbc.com/news/health-51168333

Wuhan Municipal Health Commission claimed no cases among related contacts: January 19/20, 2020, http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2020012009077  (Chinese language)

First acknowledgement by China and WHO of human-human transmission of coronavirus: January 20, 2020, https://abcnews.go.com/Health/human-human-transmission-coronavirus-reported-china/story?id=68403105

WHO delegation reported human-human transmission had happened (January 20-21), announced by WHO: January 22, 2020, https://www.who.int/china/news/detail/22-01-2020-field-visit-wuhan-china-jan-2020


It can be seen that, at the least, WHO was relying entirely on China's statements that there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission. A more tendentious way of describing the relationship would be "hand-in-glove", and I think that characterization may be accurate.

Keep in mind that these claims, from December 31st through January 20th were a large part of the "knowledge" the Trump Administration was working with during that time frame. Context matters, then, when actions were being taken, and now (and into the foreseeable future) as January actions are being snarked using April "knowledge".
If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"? Is reality a Big Pharma Shill?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.

Offline Formerly Once-Ler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 0
Quote
“Right from the start, from the first notification we received on the 31st of December, given that this was a cluster of pneumonia — I’m a MERS specialist, so my background is in coronaviruses and influenza — so immediately thought, given that this is a respiratory pathogen, that of course there may be human-to-human transmission,” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove said in a press briefing Monday.

So we agree.  WHO has a lot of blood on their hands.  Who did you say you work for?

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,421
https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2020/04/14/left-guidance-mers-specialist-says-suspected-community-spread-december/

WHO Left The Guidance Out? MERS Specialist Says She Suspected Community Spread In December, Said So; Update: GOP Senators Demand Explanation From WHO
ED MORRISSEY  Posted at 12:01 pm on April 14, 2020
Quote
If Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove suspected MERS-like transmission of the emerging COVID-19 outbreak in China, then why did the World Health Organization explicitly cast doubt on the risk of human-to-human transmission two weeks later? In a WHO briefing yesterday, a reporter asked WHO’s representatives to answer criticism from the White House that WHO was “late to the game” on the coronavirus’ pandemic potential. ...
...

Quote
... So with regards to the human-to-human transmission question ... from the first notification that we received on the 31st of December, given that this was a cluster of pneumonia.  I’m a MERS specialist, so my background is in coronaviruses and in influenza, so (I) immediately thought, given that it’s a respiratory pathogen, that of course there may be human to human transmission.

... when we started to put together our technical guidance for our member states, we put guidance that focused on how this virus could be transmitted. And what we focused on was droplet and contact transmission, ... That guidance is still in effect. The guidance that we put up was on the 10th of January.

That timing becomes verrrrry interesting, because it was just three days later that WHO officially advised the world that they had no evidence at all of a risk of community spread. ...
...
Quote
On December 31, 2019, Taiwan sent an email to the International Health Regulations (IHR) focal point under the World Health Organization (WHO), informing WHO of its understanding of the disease and also requesting further information from WHO. Given the lack of clarity at the time, as well as the many rumors that were circulating, Taiwan’s aim was to ensure that all relevant parties remained alert, especially since the outbreak occurred just before the Lunar New Year holiday, which typically sees tremendous amounts of travel. To be prudent, in the email we took pains to refer to atypical pneumonia, and specifically noted that patients had been isolated for treatment. Public health professionals could discern from this wording that there was a real possibility of human-to-human transmission of the disease. ...
...
Update: Axios reports this morning that seven Senate Republicans have sent a demand for answers from Tedros and WHO, and made it clear that their response will matter when it comes to funding decisions. They apparently suspect that some WHO officials might be on the take:

The article is fairly longish, touching at least four major points:

1. Experts within WHO thought human-human transmission likely;

2. Experienced people in Taiwan warned WHO's healthcare professionals that human-human transmission might be happening;

3. WHO ignored both Taiwan and its own experts in its public communications;

4. Some US Senators are asking very pointed questions of WHO, directed at WHO's reliance on China and reasons for that reliance.

The recently update China timeline linked below in my signature shows how over 2-3 weeks, WHO simply repeated what Wuhan health officials claimed.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2020, 10:48:41 pm by PeteS in CA »
If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"? Is reality a Big Pharma Shill?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.