Let's separate the issues here, folks. On the issue of having sex with Tlaib, even extreme drunkenness would likely be insufficient (although if she's buying, I could perhaps string her along for a few pours.)
As for abortion, yes it's wrong, but so is the deprivation by the state of her choice whether and when to reproduce. The natural right is that of self-determination - the right we all have to decide for ourselves our path in life. I understand the primacy of this issue for women - how can we be surprised when they object to such an arbitrary deprivation of liberty?
You can't always get what you want. As much as folks would applaud the state banning abortion, that's unconstitutional, and must remain so. The remedy is persuasion and support.
To be honest I don't know what v versus v here is in this SCOTUS hearing. Nothing will stop abortions at the human level.
What I want is that NO public funds are allocated for abortions. NO PTSD counseling or wtf ever. NO taxes spent.
Just for fun. I was doing my robot thread. Tried to start robot 2, but it was me that didn't drive it.
But here is the question. At least, if you are familiar with Asimov's THREE hee hee hee three basic laws for robots.
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws
So, fundamentally, if you asked an AI.
Not number 1: Artificial Narrow Intelligence
Not number 2: Artificial General Intelligence
Not number 3: Artificial Super Intelligence
What would they say?
Just kidding . That shit was so yesterdayhuman.
7 Types Of Artificial IntelligenceNot going to link it.
