So, you're saying he didn't date a 17 year old when he was in his 30's? And you're also saying he DIDN'T lose to a democrat in what is a deep, deep, deep red state?
Frankly, I don't care what his positions are on the issues...no more than I care what Michael Jackson or Jeffrey Epstein's positions were. He's a perv who's certain to lose again if he were to be nominated...which he won't be.
As for what Nancy wants...well...she wants the Republicans to nominate guys like Roy Moore. Why you want to oblige her and further her Socialist goals is a true mystery.
IIRC, she was 19, not 17; he was 32, fresh from West Point, two tours in the Army, and law school. Those two years (in her age) make a big difference.
Dating a nineteen year-old doesn't make him a perv, it makes you jealous!
Besides, dating in those days did not necessarily involve having sex (more like a movie and a malted), and was done with the permission of her parents.
Not the same thing as cruising for some kid at the sock hop.
Did he lose to a Democrat? (Jones)
Yep, after being smeared by Democrats and and the media in the 11th hour and abandoned by Republicans who repeated the lies. (Sex smears, See also: Clarence Thomas Confirmation, Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation)
He won two other elections (Chief Justice, AL Supreme Court, twice), and lost one primary (for Governor), which puts his batting average at .500, electorally.
I am at a loss to see how Roy Moore would further the goals of the Socialists. He is about as solid on the US Constitution as you are going to find, and even got in trouble for upholding the Alabama Constitution's marriage Amendment when he was Chief Justice. I just don't see that making any headway for the Marxists at all.