I don't see how any of that real changes anything.
It's a more honest assessment of what Reagan was trying to say.
What are the "social views" of the libertarian philosophy, and I'm using libertarian with a small "l" as opposed to the capital L that is the Libertarian Party in particular). As best as I can figure, "social views" are completely irrelevant to libertarianism because it is a principle/philosophy that applies only to government, and not to social views.
This is where the Conservatives and the Libertarians part ways on social issues:
Oppose the death penalty. (May 2016)
Support restitution; and maintain constitutional safeguards. (Nov 2014)
Three Strikes approach is illusory & dangerous. (Nov 2000)
Omnibus Crime Bill, including death penalty, has failed. (Nov 2000)
Encourage private efforts to fight crime. (Jul 2000)
Allow drugs, alcohol, prostitution, gambling, and suicide. (Jul 2000)
Strengthen, not reduce, the rights of the accused. (Jul 2000)
Hate crimes are used to punish blacks. (Feb 2000)
De-fund war on drugs, and end violent drug cartels. (Jan 2015)
Repeal all drug laws creating “crimes†without victims. (May 2008)
The war on drugs threatens individual liberties. (Jul 2000)
No gender identity restrictions on child custody or adoption. (May 2016)
Eliminate all restrictions on immigration. (Jul 2000)
https://www.ontheissues.org/Libertarian_Party.htmThose are the big social issues where the Libertarian party sounds more like the Progressives in the Democrat party today. Then there's the ideological split when it comes to military and foreign policy as well. And we won't even get into some of the more radical ideas about finance like returning tot he Gold Standard.