That is, what was said, early on. There have also been 'false flag's" where people were used for the crime, but were actually dead. Now, you want proof.
DEEP STATE doing the killings. Black-ops...witnesses say 3 to 4 people doing the shooting, then they find, some mentally ill person on medication to blame it on! Right after Omar says 'white men are dangerous". Betts died in 2014. Hartford news. These inks are now 404'ed & 'can't find". Being removed from history. (shooting was 2019)
Error 404 (Not Found)!!1
It hasn't exactly gone unnoticed that many of the mass killing shooters were on some sort of psych drugs, from Kliebold and Harris (Columbine) onward, and very possibly before that incident.
While that sure seems to be the case, that these (non-jihadist, mass) shooters all had some sort of mental issues, might not the presence of mental illness be sufficient in itself?
The question arises of motive, and aside from 'spooking the herd' for the purpose of manipulating people en masse to throw their rights away for a false sense of security, I can't really see a motive, unless there were specific individuals in these crowds who were targeted and the other victims were just to add randomness and noise to cover for a specific hit.
In that instance, there are a host of other methods that would be less messy and have less collateral damage--something more precise, and just as easy to make appear misfortune or accident. Those controlling the narrative (official records, etc released to the press) have the ability to make anyone look like they were despondent, a lunatic, like they had a substance abuse problem, etc. Even Epstein under suicide watch managed to check out, with (likely) or without the assistance of others.
If there are characteristics of individuals among the victims of these shootings which might indicate a deep state or other interest group's specific motives, the victim lists should be scrutinized for common threads which might tie down who is behind these killings, assuming for a moment that there would be a single group or entity behind them with reason to target individuals in the groups killed. I remain unconvinced, despite the apparent readiness of the totalitarians in our government to pounce on such events and use them to try to pass legislation--a tactic which I believe the People are becoming increasingly resistant to.
I think the speed with which legislation is proposed is more a factor influenced by the readiness of those who would remove or compromise the RKBA to utilize such events to further their disarmament agenda, and not that they are coordinating and preparing such legislation for any specific incident. (an area, perhaps the GOP should study in order to get their legislation ready for when they have an advantage in Congress and elsewhere, rather than play tiddlywinks sitting on their thumbs for two years with a clear policy setting advantage).
At any rate, whether there is some totalitarian entity behind the killings, or whether they are the result of individual unrelated and demented minds, the awakening of American gun owners cannot be ignored, especially as the popularity of the very firearms which those who seek to disarm us want to take most has increased, despite media attempts to demonize them. We will resist any attempts to disarm us, as Virginia proves so far.
Incidents like this one only show why and only prove to Americans that they need to keep their ability to be armed.
In the video, the spacing of shots is about one second. From the first shot by the perp to the last by the security guy, only 2-3 seconds passed. Imagine having to rely on police to be called, respond, and then do anything, and the shooter would be out of ammo or targets by then, if not overcome by other means.
Most people couldn't have their phone out and dial 9-1-1 before the incident was over. As I said, and at risk of being repetitive, this only underscores the need for Americans of good character to be armed.
