Report: Indictments May Be Coming Soon From Barr-Durham Investigation

[rangerrebew]

 


Report: Indictments May Be Coming Soon From Barr-Durham Investigation
 

Chris Donaldson
Follow Chris Donaldson
Posted December 28, 2019 in Politics 

Now that the Justice Department Inspector General report on FISA abuse has been released, all eyes are on prosecutor John Durham whose probe into the origins of the Russia hoax is ongoing.

With the media covering the Democrat impeachment sham, the work of I.G. Michael Horowitz got little play in the mainstream media despite the damning revelations in his report of FBI deception of the secret surveillance court.

But while Horowitz's scope was limited, Durham's isn't and there is a very serious possibility that high-level Obama regime figures are going to end up on the receiving end of indictments.

https://trendingpolitics.com/report-indictments-may-be-coming-soon-from-barr-durham-investigation/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email

[sneakypete]

But while Horowitz's scope was limited, Durham's isn't and there is a very serious possibility that high-level Obama regime figures are going to end up on the receiving end of indictments.

Not unless actual Republicans,NOT RINO's take over control of Congress. As long as the Dims or RINO's are in charge,they will block any attempt to bring charges and convictions.

[AL]

Let's hope the indictments come soon.  With all of the e-mail evidence and reports you'd think that some of these coup conspirators would already by in court or jail.

[Chosen Daughter]

Its probably the same as the promise to "lock her up".  Only meant to get a crowd of Q excited.  Trump was never serious and he said Hillary had suffered enough.  He also honored her presence at the Inauguration.

I wouldn't get excited.  This is all a big Trump reality show.

[sneakypete]

Let's hope the indictments come soon.  With all of the e-mail evidence and reports you'd think that some of these coup conspirators would already by in court or jail.

@AL

One is. I can't remember which one right now,but one is in protective custody at his how request,and is testifying under oath against his co-conspirators.

His name is mentioned here all over the place,but I just can't recall it right now.

[The_Reader_David]

Not unless actual Republicans,NOT RINO's take over control of Congress. As long as the Dims or RINO's are in charge,they will block any attempt to bring charges and convictions.

Who is in control of Congress is absolutely irrelevant to whether the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia returns indictments, unless you think a GOP controlled Senate (even if you regard most of the GOP Senators as "RINOs") is going to vote private bills which Trump will sign to block a prosecution he asked for, or almost as absurd that there would be enough votes in both houses of Congress to override a veto of said private bills.

[sneakypete]

Who is in control of Congress is absolutely irrelevant to whether the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia returns indictments, unless you think a GOP controlled Senate (even if you regard most of the GOP Senators as "RINOs") is going to vote private bills which Trump will sign to block a prosecution he asked for, or almost as absurd that there would be enough votes in both houses of Congress to override a veto of said private bills.

@The_Reader_David

What you say may be true in an IDEAL world,but we don't live in an ideal world. We live in a partisan political world,and regardless of our wishes one way or the other,Congress DOES control spending,and they DO have the authority to investigate anyone they wish,for any reason at all,or NO reason at all,other than "I wanted to". He who controls the purse strings swings a pretty damn big hammer when it comes to asking government agencies for cooperation.