LIVE THREAD>> Judiciary Impeachment Hearing

[mystery-ak]

Jon Zal
@OfficialJonZal
·
2m
I'm unfamiliar with House rules, so can someone please answer this for me: When Professor Karlan's testimony is over, is she required to return Doug Collins's balls, or does he have to make a motion for that?

[XenaLee]

Rebecca Kaplan
@RebeccaRKaplan
·
3m
Second Democratic witness is equally forceful on whether Trump has committed impeachable offenses. Stanford Prof. Pamela Karlan: "Drawing a foreign government into our election process is an
especially serious abuse of power because it undermines democracy itself."

Which the Democrats would know all about... since they have been doing what they're accusing Trump of doing... for decades.

[mystery-ak]

Jack Posobiec
🇺🇸
@JackPosobiec
·
40s
Is this an Impeachment hearing or a DNC rally?

[mystery-ak]

Ana Navarro-Cárdenas
@ananavarro
·
1m
Apropos of nothing in particular...the women -Amb. Yavanovich, Fiona Hill and now, Prof. Pamela Karlan- who have testified in front of these Impeachment Hearings are amazing and no-nonsense. They make me feel like standing up in my living room, amd shouting, “Yes, girl. Yes!”

[mystery-ak]

Kayleigh McEnany
@kayleighmcenany
·
48s
Second Democrat impeachment witness is just as biased as the first!

Liberal professor Pamela Karlan:

❌
 2016: began discussing @realDonaldTrump
 impeachment  (long before Ukraine call!)

❌
 2017: said election could be “illegitimate because it was stolen by the Russians.”

[mystery-ak]

Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
·
6m
these liberal constitutional-scholar witnesses advocating impeachment are coming off as angry and shrill

[mystery-ak]

Ellen Carmichael
@ellencarmichael
·
1m
This hearing is an absolute zoo.


Richard Baris
@Peoples_Pundit
·
8m
These do not sound like reason-driven legal scholars. They sound like rabid ideologues.

[Cyber Liberty]

Ana Navarro-Cárdenas
@ananavarro
·
1m
Apropos of nothing in particular...the women -Amb. Yavanovich, Fiona Hill and now, Prof. Pamela Karlan- who have testified in front of these Impeachment Hearings are amazing and no-nonsense. They make me feel like standing up in my living room, amd shouting, “Yes, girl. Yes!”

Navarro is correct:  It's apropos of nothing.

[mystery-ak]

Jack Posobiec
🇺🇸
@JackPosobiec
·
2m
PosoCheck: There is no evidence of either



Quote Tweet
CBS Evening News
@CBSEveningNews
 Â· 15m
Harvard Law Prof. Noah Feldman: "There's no mystery about the words 'high crimes and misdemeanors.' The word high modifies both crimes and misdemeanors, so they're both high. And high means connected to the office of the presidency -- connected to office." https://

[mystery-ak]

Kevin McCarthy
@GOPLeader
·
1h
"There must never be a narrowly-voted impeachment or an impeachment substantially supported by one of our major political parties and largely opposed by the other.”
 
"Such an impeachment would lack legitimacy."
 
Good point, Chairman Nadler.

[skeeter]

Navarro is correct:  It's apropos of nothing.

Its appropriate for an irrational person.

[mystery-ak]

Mark Meadows
@RepMarkMeadows
In case you were inclined to believe the Democrats' suggestion that their witnesses are unbiased, here's one of them—Noah Feldman—building the case for impeaching President Trump in April, 2017. Not even 3 months after inauguration.


Quote Tweet
Slate's Trumpcast
@realTrumpcast
 Â· Apr 10, 2017
Today: @jacobwe and @NoahRFeldman begin to build the case for the impeachment of Donald Trump: https://megaphone.link/PPY7763026733

[mystery-ak]

Alex Moe
@AlexNBCNews
·
2m
Dem Rep Al Green comes to tell press that he is disappointed there is not a person of color testifying before the Judiciary Committee impeachment inquiry hearing

[mystery-ak]

Caleb Howe
@CalebHowe
·
1m
Stanford Law Professor Pamela Karlan did less an "opening statement" and more a "loudening rant-ment"

[mystery-ak]

Raheem Kassam
@RaheemKassam
·
18m
Dem Witness Noah Feldman Penned Fawning Defense of Islamic Shariah Law

[mystery-ak]

Kimberly Guilfoyle
@kimguilfoyle
Today’s hearing in a nutshell:

House Dems are having leftist attorneys share partisan opinions on the hearsay of a few people who had no firsthand knowledge.

No facts. No new information. Just a partisan Trump-hating sham. But this is the only thing the Dems have to offer.

[mystery-ak]

Josh Holmes
@HolmesJosh
·
5m
My god this hearing boring.

[mystery-ak]

Lee Zeldin
@RepLeeZeldin
·
1m
Congrats to the professors who won the Dems’ nationwide talent search for the most elitist, unhinged anti-Trump professors in America. These meltdowns based on triggered emotions, 3% of the facts & ignoring the other 97% of the story is a permanent stain on US history. Good work.

[mystery-ak]

Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
·
2m
BREAKING: Constitutional-scholar witness Jonathan Turley will argue that the Democrats' impeachment crusade is essentially a Constitution-abusing partisan stunt that dangerously lowers "impeachment standards to fit a paucity of evidence and an abundance of anger [against Trump]."

[mystery-ak]

Laura Ingraham
@IngrahamAngle
·
2m
She seemed upset.  She donated $1,000 to Elizabeth Warren in July.

[mystery-ak]

Steve Guest
@SteveGuest
·
3m
Pamela Karlan was also floated as an Obama Supreme Court nominee because she is an “unapologetic liberal” and she was named as a potential Supreme Court pick of Hillary Clinton.

[mystery-ak]

Buck Sexton
@BuckSexton
·
50s
My favorite part of Democrats impeachment theater is when these petty demagogues pretend they really don’t want this, it just pains them to impeach Trump, it makes them sorrowful and prayerful (lol!) for the nation-

Only a moron believes this, and only a fraud would say it

[mystery-ak]

Elizabeth Harrington
@LizRNC
·
53s
Agreed, Professor Karlan!

"Elections matter"

@realDonaldTrump
 won. It's time for you and your fellow Democrats to accept that fact!

[mystery-ak]

RepScottPerry
@RepScottPerry
·
3m
Before his testimony today, Jonathan Turley - Democrat - noted that Schiff’s public hearings failed to provide a complete picture and “conflicted on critical points.” Do you wonder why Democrats didn’t call HIM as their own witness?

[mystery-ak]