LIVE THREAD>> Judiciary Impeachment Hearing

[mystery-ak]

Aaron Blake
@AaronBlake
·
1m
GOP is very clearly trying to ruffle Nadler, who was criticized for his handling of the Lewandowski hearing and was bypassed in favor of Schiff's committee prior to today.

[mystery-ak]

PBS NewsHour Retweeted
Lisa Desjardins
@LisaDNews
·
2m
WHAT WAS THAT?

Democrats voted to table GOP motion demanding that Intel Chairman Schiff testify.  It was tabled on party-line vote. 24-17.

GOP is also using this as a way to add time/obstacles to a hearing they object to... and want to undermine.

[Wingnut]

[mystery-ak]

Diamond and Silk®
@DiamondandSilk
·
56s
Nadler has already started this clown show off with a lie. He must've forgotten that there was no Russia collusion!

[mystery-ak]

Nikki Haley
@NikkiHaley
·
4m
I don’t believe the Dems are pushing these impeachment hearings because they believe they can defeat the Pres.I believe this is a political game to win senate seats of those senators in vulnerable http://elections.It is one of the biggest political campaigns we have ever seen

[mystery-ak]

Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
·
28m
Facts:

Democrats’ three “star witnesses” for Jerry Nadler’s impeachment sham have donated $18,000 to Democrats—including ones currently running for president

How is this not a partisan witch hunt?

[mystery-ak]

Jon Ward
@jonward11
·
5m
Judiciary just voted down motion to call Schiff to testify. A month ago, Dems running impeachment didn't reject idea. To be fair it was a new thought to them at the time when I asked about it. Over the past month, whatever openness there was disappeared.

[mystery-ak]

Daily Caller
@DailyCaller
·
55s
Harvard Law Professor Noah Feldman says that "on the basis of the testimony before the House, President Trump has committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors by corruptly abusing the office of the presidency."

[mystery-ak]

Bo Snerdley
@BoSnerdley
·
1m
This Judiciary Committee hearing on "impeachment" is total BS. This Harvard professor now, comes off to me as  just another anti-Trump liberals, hiding behind his Ivy League title.  Jerry Nadler is... well... never mind. Want to keep it civil.

[XenaLee]

Good God Almighty.    This is, to put it bluntly.... f'ing ridiculous.

A Trump-hating Harvard professor pontificating and lecturing... ad nauseam.... on the merits of "Impeachment".

What the bloody hell does this have to do with ANYTHING?

Just when I start to think things in this country can't possibly get any more surreal....

the Democrats prove me wrong.

The Democrats, American's enemy within, are dragging this nation through the proverbial mud.   Only.... that stuff isn't "mud".

[mystery-ak]

Doug Heye
@DougHeye
·
2m
I can't recall a time when a panel of law professors swayed voter opinion.

[mystery-ak]

Buck Sexton
@BuckSexton
·
5m
It’s hard to overstate how petulant, pathetic, deranged, and childish Congressional Democrats and prestige media outlets have become in their desperation to impeach President Trump

It’s both hilarious and deeply troubling

[mystery-ak]

Steve Scalise
@SteveScalise
·
34m
Jerry Nadler’s record:

– Campaigned for Judiciary chairman saying he's best for impeachment
– Voted to impeach the President back in July
– Told CNN the evidence is "damning" before hearings began

This isn't about the truth. He's wanted to impeach @realDonaldTrump
 for months.

[mystery-ak]

Washington Examiner
@dcexaminer
·
4m
.@RepDougCollins
 

The Democrats are already drafting articles of impeachment, don't be fooled.

[mystery-ak]

Andrew Desiderio
@AndrewDesiderio
·
36s
House Judiciary is now voting on a motion to table a GOP motion to delay the hearing for one week. It will pass on party lines — and the hearing will resume.

[mystery-ak]

Andrew Desiderio
@AndrewDesiderio
·
36s
House Judiciary is now voting on a motion to table a GOP motion to delay the hearing for one week. It will pass on party lines — and the hearing will resume.

[skeeter]

David Axelrod
@davidaxelrod
·
1m
Collins says this entire exercise is about a “checkbook and a calendar.”
And he’s right.
The president had the nation’s checkbook and used it to leverage Ukraine to launch a probe against the Bidens before 2020.

Embarrassingly childish tweet.

[mystery-ak]

Jonathan Allen
@jonallendc
·
1m
Harvard's Noah Feldman: The phone call is evidence of an impeachable offense. "On its own soliciting the leader of a foreign government [to announce probes] would constitute a high crime and misdemeanor." Separately, he says, freezing aid & WH meeting and conditionality are h/c&m

[mystery-ak]

Jack Posobiec
🇺🇸
@JackPosobiec
·
2m
Democrat Witness: Evidence Of Crime Not Needed To Impeach Trump

[mystery-ak]

CBS News
@CBSNews
·
2m
Harvard Law School Professor Noah Feldman: "President Trump's conduct, as described in the testimony and evidence, clearly constitutes impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors under the Constitution." https://

[mystery-ak]

Buck Sexton
@BuckSexton
·
2m
If there’s one thing that’s finally going to convince rust belt voters and independents in purple states to turn against Trump, it’s having some pompous tenured professor from Harvard Law School give America a boring lecture on “the constitutional origins of orange man bad”

[mystery-ak]

Bo Snerdley
@BoSnerdley
·
2m
The facts that this outraged professor - Pamela Karlan - is citing were not ALLOWED by Adam Schiff and his bogus committee to be disputed. So spare us the outrage that you are so insulted. This entire process is INSULTING to the American people.


Jonathan Allen
@jonallendc
·
2m
Stanford Law professor Pamela Karlan scolds Collins, says she's "insulted" by his suggestion that she would testify without reading the evidence. Says she read every transcript of witness testimony. There's your first "moment."

[mystery-ak]

Rebecca Kaplan
@RebeccaRKaplan
·
3m
Second Democratic witness is equally forceful on whether Trump has committed impeachable offenses. Stanford Prof. Pamela Karlan: "Drawing a foreign government into our election process is an
especially serious abuse of power because it undermines democracy itself."

[XenaLee]

Bo Snerdley
@BoSnerdley
·
2m
The facts that this outraged professor - Pamela Karlan - is citing were not ALLOWED by Adam Schiff and his bogus committee to be disputed. So spare us the outrage that you are so insulted. This entire process is INSULTING to the American people.


Jonathan Allen
@jonallendc
·
2m
Stanford Law professor Pamela Karlan scolds Collins, says she's "insulted" by his suggestion that she would testify without reading the evidence. Says she read every transcript of witness testimony. There's your first "moment."

Just because she read it.... doesn't mean she comprehended and understood what she read.   She is, after all, a typical leftist.

[mystery-ak]

Katie Pavlich
@KatiePavlich
·
1m
So we've gone from bribery to treason. Okay.