Kamala Harris drops out of 2020 presidential race

[jmyrlefuller]

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/03/kamala-harris-drops-out-out-of-presidential-race-074902

Developing...

[TomSea]

Good...   

[Gefn]

Lead headline on Drudge

https://mobile.twitter.com/IsaacDovere/status/1201923942589616128

He had this tweet also

[Hoodat]

Kamala Harris drops bid for 2020 Democratic nomination

Naomi Lim & Joseph Simonson     |     December 03, 2019 01:05 PM

Kamala Harris has bowed out of contention for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.

Hours before Harris announced she was exiting the Democratic primary, her campaign canceled a New York City fundraiser that was expected to have a number of her wealthy bundlers in attendance. At the time, Harris's team said the cancellation was because of a "personal matter" and offered no further explanation.

In November, she closed down her entire New Hampshire campaign operations, in a bid to shift all her resources to the Iowa caucuses. Weeks earlier, Harris fired dozens of staffers from her campaign headquarters in Baltimore, Maryland. By the end of the third quarter, Harris's campaign had the highest cash burn rate of any other candidate running for office, spending 122.9% of all dollars donated.  .  .

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/kamala-harris-drops-bid-for-2020-democratic-nomination

[skeeter]

Oh noooo

[mystery-ak]

Edward-Isaac Dovere
@IsaacDovere
NEWS - Kamala Harris is dropping out of the presidential election today, I'm told reliably. She's informing staff now.
11:59 AM · Dec 3, 2019

[mountaineer]

No more Indian-Jamaican candidates in the race?! Oh no!

[Free Vulcan]

I didn't think I could despise a politician as much as I could Hillary, but Kamala rocketed right up to the top of the list.

[jafo2010]

Let's get serious.  Harris had ZERO chance
                          Booker has ZERO chance
                          Castro has ZERO chance
                          Warren, Fauxcahontas, has ZERO chance, despite getting traction(why?, pathological liar)
                          Sanders has ZERO chance (damn devout commie!!!)
                          Biden...ZERO chance...why?  Senile as one can be...pathetic his wife let him do this
                          Buttigieg...ZERO chance...why?  America is not ready to vote for an open gay man as POTUS
                          Yang...ZERO chance...talk about free, offers $1,000/month per person and the liberal wingnuts
                              are not embracing it
                          Klobachar...ZERO chance...offers nothing
                          Styer...billionaire yes, but he has ZERO message, ZERO chance
                          and finally, all the rest...I can't think of their names, so really the no names have ZERO chance!!!

Bottomline, the clowns are falling out of the car.  And yes, it will be a BILLIONAIRE that takes the Democommie Party.  It is between Bloomberg and Clinton.  You think Bloomberg keeps his share when she announces?  No way.

Best strategy for Clinton, get selected at the convention which means she only has to campaign for 4.5 months.  She will have the $$$ and she will have the energy for a 4.5 month campaign.  And she knows where she made mistakes last time.  And last time, she was constantly being threatened over her felonies with her emails.  You got to believe it is Clinton behind this nonsense that causes endless threats to Trump with every reason that gets them a negative sound bite, which will continue right up to the election. 

I'm sorry, but I see it as TRUMP vs CLINTON.......still!!

Here is a hint for Democommies.  TRY PRESENTING A PLATFORM THAT BENEFITS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, THE AMERICAN ELECTORATE. Most voters do not want to hear ANYTHING that benefits ILLEGAL INVADING ALIENS!  Trump got elected because he defined issues that concern voters.  HR Clinton did not!  She lost when she was expected to walk to the finish line, it was in the bag.

To attack the president is a losing strategy, particularly on those issues that he did not accomplish results.  Again, issues that benefit the American electorate, the working electorate will win the day.  Nothing else, none of this nonsense the morons in the Democommie are pushing. 

                             

[truth_seeker]

Upon dropping out, Harriss complained the White House used "all white" decorations for Xmas.

She'll be throwing her full weight, back onto Willlie.

[mountaineer]

Upon dropping out, Harriss complained the White House used "all white" decorations for Xmas.

She'll be throwing her full weight, back onto Willlie.

I hope his current girlfriend doesn't mind.

[mystery-ak]

Harris to supporters: 'I'm not a billionaire. I can't fund my own campaign.'
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/472838-harris-to-supporters-im-not-a-billionaire-i-cant-fund-my-own-campaign

[Hoodat]

Let's get serious.  Harris had ZERO chance
                          Booker has ZERO chance
                          Castro has ZERO chance
                          Warren, Fauxcahontas, has ZERO chance, despite getting traction(why?, pathological liar)
                          Sanders has ZERO chance (damn devout commie!!!)
                          Biden...ZERO chance...why?  Senile as one can be...pathetic his wife let him do this
                          Buttigieg...ZERO chance...why?  America is not ready to vote for an open gay man as POTUS
                          Yang...ZERO chance...talk about free, offers $1,000/month per person and the liberal wingnuts
                              are not embracing it
                          Klobachar...ZERO chance...offers nothing
                          Styer...billionaire yes, but he has ZERO message, ZERO chance
                          and finally, all the rest...I can't think of their names, so really the no names have ZERO chance!!!

Of that list of zero-chancers, I would rate Klobachar at the top.  But the bottom line here is who will the Democrat Powers That Be prop up?  They propped up John F'n Kerry in 2004.  They propped up the Obama puppet (and McCain) in 2008.  And they passively propped up Hillary (and Trump) in 2016.  At some point, they will chime in behind someone, and at that point, that 'someone' will instantly become a legitimate candidate.

Note that there is no ability requirement for this 'someone' other than the ability to get elected.  (See:  Obama).  But at some point in the near future, you are going to see a shift from every news organization as they fall in line to transform this anointed candidate into a contender.

[Bigun]

 

[jafo2010]

Hoodat...or they prop up no one.  Why?  Because everything has been choreographed for HR Clinton being the nominee for the Democommie Party.  Do you really think she relinquished control over these morons?  No way.

So if you are HRC, and you have low energy, and you do not want to run around for one full year before the election, how do you win?  It is all choreographed.  She is selected in the convention, and she is the ONLY Democommie that has a chance against Trump.

She has the energy to live in largely six states: WI, MI, OH, PA, FL and NC for 4.5 months.  She does this, she has a shot.

[libertybele]

Hoodat...or they prop up no one.  Why?  Because everything has been choreographed for HR Clinton being the nominee for the Democommie Party.  Do you really think she relinquished control over these morons?  No way.

So if you are HRC, and you have low energy, and you do not want to run around for one full year before the election, how do you win?  It is all choreographed.  She is selected in the convention, and she is the ONLY Democommie that has a chance against Trump.

She has the energy to live in largely six states: WI, MI, OH, PA, FL and NC for 4.5 months.  She does this, she has a shot.

Seriously?? HRC is all done, and she's been done.  She knows it and the DNC knows it.  Her base has dwindled and the $$ machine behind her is no longer. 

[mountaineer]

Well, they have to pick someone to run against the evil orange man. Crazy Bernie or Lie-a-watha, then? Or Buttgay?

[Maj. Bill Martin]

Hoodat...or they prop up no one.  Why?  Because everything has been choreographed for HR Clinton being the nominee for the Democommie Party.  Do you really think she relinquished control over these morons?  No way.

I don't think she relinquished control - I think she lost whatever control she may have had after getting clobbered in 2016.

So if you are HRC, and you have low energy, and you do not want to run around for one full year before the election, how do you win?  It is all choreographed.  She is selected in the convention, and she is the ONLY Democommie that has a chance against Trump.

Well, I'm sure she'd like to think that's what is going to happen.  But I can't fathom why any of the other candidates would go along with that.  Biden is not going to give up on what is clearly his last shot, and Sanders and Warren likewise aren't going to step aside when they're both already in their 70's.  This campaign is their last shot too.  And Hillary has very little support among the young progressives that have all the energy in that party.  They can't stand her because to them, she's just part of "the Establishment."

Delegates to the DNC are primarily elected from among the supporters of the candidates who won the caucuses and primaries. Those people are not going to vote for her just because it's something she wants.  That means she'd have to campaign, very actively, in enough primary states to win the primary.  Don't see her doing that for the next 5 months.

[aligncare]

 

Whew! Dodged a bullet there.

 

[Wingnut]

I hope his current girlfriend doesn't mind.

A throuple? Libs love their throuples

[corbe]

[jafo2010]

Maj Bill,

Generally, I would agree with what you are saying, but I disagree with your conclusions.

First, would you agree that Fauxcahontas and Sanders divide the ultra liberals and therefore blank each other out.  Yes, they will get delegates in states that divide them based on votes received.  They will not take many if any winner take all states.  Biden will drop out.  He is not raising the money he needs, and he will not win in the first couple states, and his following will dissipate like steam.  I NEVER believed he would get far past Iowa.  Still do.  Buttboy may very well win Iowa, and New Hampshire, but he does not do much beyond that.  Bloomberg may end up winning a state or two, but again, he does not rise up to champion the party nomination.

And yes, there is still time for Clinton to get in and follow the same strategy that Bloomberg is doing.  But with the way things are, a brokered convention is very possible.

Clinton has the money, and she does have the following, or enough of one to be victorious.

[mountaineer]

HRC does have a following, for some strange reason. She may well end up being the "we need a savior, and Hillary's the only one for the job" candidate.

[mountaineer]

The Daily Wire   @realDailyWire
Who will the Kamala Harris supporter turn to now that she’s out?
3:13 PM · Dec 3, 2019


d-Mac   @bookakurra
Replying to   @realDailyWire
Michelle Obama, after she announces. Expect it in the next few weeks
3:15 PM · Dec 3, 2019

[berdie]

The Daily Wire   @realDailyWire
Who will the Kamala Harris supporter turn to now that she’s out?
3:13 PM · Dec 3, 2019


d-Mac   @bookakurra
Replying to   @realDailyWire
Michelle Obama, after she announces. Expect it in the next few weeks
3:15 PM · Dec 3, 2019

I have been expecting this @mountaineer . It kind of makes me sick (if she does) since she will be a walk away and we really don't need Barack Part Deux. But Barack would be great at FLOTUS /s.  You know he knows how to hang curtains.