Author Topic: The case for identifying the whistleblower by Washington Examiner  (Read 115 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 385,464
  • Let's Go Brandon!
The case for identifying the whistleblower
by Washington Examiner
 | October 12, 2019 09:43 AM

The identity of the person who filed the intelligence community whistleblower complaint that sparked the drive to impeach President Trump remains a secret. Democrats leading the impeachment campaign say his or her identity (for brevity, the whistleblower will hereafter be referred to as "he") must remain closely guarded. Advocates of whistleblower laws, such as Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, agree.

The New York Times came under heavy criticism when it reported that the whistleblower is a CIA officer. "Any decision to report any perceived identifying information of the whistleblower is deeply concerning and reckless, as it can place the individual in harm's way," Andrew Bakaj, the whistleblower's lawyer, told the Times. "The whistleblower has a right to anonymity."

Does he? And does that right outweigh the rights of the public to know salient facts in a proceeding designed to lead to the impeachment and removal of the president?

more
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/the-case-for-identifying-the-whistleblower
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,862
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: The case for identifying the whistleblower by Washington Examiner
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2019, 01:23:45 am »
Forgive me, folks, 'cause I'm dumb.

But isn't one of the fundamentals of our legal/justice system... that "the accused" has the right to confront "the accuser" making the charges?

If this person refuses to step out of the shadows and state his accusations publicly... then... he should simply be... ignored.