Trump admin to consider allowing local governments to veto refugee resettlement

[Chosen Daughter]

Trump admin to consider allowing local governments to veto refugee resettlement
Daniel Horowitz · August 22, 2019   

Amid a week full of executive realigning of immigration policies with the original laws passed by Congress, the Trump administration is setting its eyes on another proposal to give the American people more of a say in the future of their society. NBC is reporting that according to a draft proposal, “the federal government will resettle refugees only where both the relevant state and local governments have consented to participate” in the resettlement program.

This is a proposal I have long championed and wrote about in my book. While immigration in general is a national policy and was designed to be dealt with at a federal level, as I explain in chapter eight of Stolen Sovereignty, refugee resettlement is different:

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/trump-admin-consider-allowing-local-governments-veto-refugee-resettlement/

States and Counties with Sanctuary policies

https://cis.org/Map-Sanctuary-Cities-Counties-and-States

I object!  All Washington State Trump voters should immediately dump the Trump.  Immigration is National policy.  It is a matter of National Security.  It would be un Constitutional to think that you can just dump illegal immigrants because you can't stop it.

[Chosen Daughter]

What he should be doing is declaring Sanctuary policy unconstitutional.   Going after those States for breaking National Law.  You can't stop illegal immigration if any of the states are enablers. 

[Applewood]

Well, where I live, it won't change things.  Both state and local officials welcome illegals and alleged "refugees" with open arms.  They don't give a karp what we citizens and taxpayers think. 

[IsailedawayfromFR]

I think that is the wrong approach.

He instead should erect a refugee resettlement camp beside Obama's new mansion on Martha's Vineyard.

[Applewood]

I think that is the wrong approach.

He instead should erect a refugee resettlement camp beside Obama's new mansion on Martha's Vineyard.

Beside it?  How about compelling the Obamas to house these illegals and "refugees" in their mansion.?  Looks like they will have plenty of room. 

I've been saying that all along -- to politicians, the Catholic Church and the rest of the so-called "do-gooders who force these people on the rest of us.  If you want to take them in, fine.  You house them and pay for their needs.

[Sanguine]

I'm glad he's proposing this.  Areas should not have to accept illegal aliens.

[PeteS in CA]

I think that is the wrong approach.

He instead should erect a refugee resettlement camp beside Obama's new mansion on Martha's Vineyard.

But they would be in danger due to Global Warming!