0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
BySara Carter -August 6, 2019Embattled former FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was first removed from the Special Counsel’s investigation into President Trump’s campaign and later fired, is suing the FBI and Justice Department for reinstatement, claiming “unrelenting pressure†from Trump led to his dismissal, according to reports.The lawsuit was filed Tuesday, and Strzok’s counsel argued in the report that he was unlawfully fired. The counsel argued that his political speech was protected under the First Amendment and those right’s were violated.Strzok was under investigation by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz for his role in the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton and her use of a private server to send classified emails. He is expected to be named in the IG’s upcoming report on how the Russia investigation was handled by the FBI....https://saraacarter.com/fired-sac-peter-strzok-sues-fbi-for-reinstatement-claiming-unrelenting-pressure-from-trump/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social-pug
They are very afraid! And that is a truly good thing!
He’ll probsbly get reinstated under the union rules.
Wasn't he fired "for cause?"
In an internal report, Candice Will, the longtime deputy director of the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility, cited three ways in which Strzok allegedly violated FBI policies during the election, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter. None had to do with the content of the text messages, though the office did note that the “overtly political tone†of the messages was “of serious concern.â€The first, “unprofessional conduct off duty,†directly related to his use of an FBI-issued cell phone to send the private texts. The second, “investigative deficiency†— later reduced to “dereliction of supervisory duty†— related to Strzok’s perceived delay in searching a laptop that belonged to Anthony Weiner, the husband of a top Hillary Clinton aide, as part of the probe of Clinton’s emails in the fall of 2016.Finally, Will told Strzok that he had committed a “security violation†for forwarding certain sensitive law-enforcement documents to his personal Gmail account.
... However, point #2 was a significant part of the IG’s report on the Clinton investigation. The IG found that the FBI had all the information it needed to investigate hundreds of thousands of emails found on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner by late September. However, for several weeks, nothing happened. From the IG report:QuoteAdditional discussions took place on October 3 and 4, 2016. However, after October 4, we found no evidence that anyone associated with the Midyear investigation, including the entire leadership team at FBI Headquarters, took any action on the Weiner laptop issue until the week of October 24, and then did so only after the Weiner case agent expressed concerns to SDNY, prompting SDNY to contact the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) on October 21 to raise concerns about the lack of action.It occurred to the IG that Strzok’s partisan texts might provide an explanation for slow-walking the investigation of the laptop in the weeks before the election. The IG looked for evidence that was the case and couldn’t find anything definitive. However, he concluded that none of the explanations offered to explain the delay made any sense:QuoteWe searched for evidence that the Weiner laptop was deliberately placed on the back-burner by others in the FBI to protect Clinton, but found no evidence in emails, text messages, instant messages, or documents that suggested an improper purpose. We also took note of the fact that numerous other FBI executives—including the approximately 39 who participated in the September 28 SVTC—were briefed on the potential existence of Midyear-related emails on the Weiner laptop. We also noted that the Russia investigation was under the supervision of Priestap—for whom we found no evidence of bias and who himself was aware of the Weiner laptop issue by September 29. However, we also did not identify a consistent or persuasive explanation for the FBI’s failure to act for almost a month after learning of potential Midyear-related emails on the Weiner laptop.
Additional discussions took place on October 3 and 4, 2016. However, after October 4, we found no evidence that anyone associated with the Midyear investigation, including the entire leadership team at FBI Headquarters, took any action on the Weiner laptop issue until the week of October 24, and then did so only after the Weiner case agent expressed concerns to SDNY, prompting SDNY to contact the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) on October 21 to raise concerns about the lack of action.
We searched for evidence that the Weiner laptop was deliberately placed on the back-burner by others in the FBI to protect Clinton, but found no evidence in emails, text messages, instant messages, or documents that suggested an improper purpose. We also took note of the fact that numerous other FBI executives—including the approximately 39 who participated in the September 28 SVTC—were briefed on the potential existence of Midyear-related emails on the Weiner laptop. We also noted that the Russia investigation was under the supervision of Priestap—for whom we found no evidence of bias and who himself was aware of the Weiner laptop issue by September 29. However, we also did not identify a consistent or persuasive explanation for the FBI’s failure to act for almost a month after learning of potential Midyear-related emails on the Weiner laptop.
This maggot should be tried, convicted and dispatched for treason and sedition and probably a dozen other felonies.Just no justice in the USA any more!!!!!!!!!!
