Is that your CT? 
Snopes isn't the most biased "fact-checker" but it is biased. They do debunk some hoaxes popular among Libs and Progs, and I occasionally have fun with that. When the hoax is one popular among conservatives I use TruthorFiction.com. To some degree I'm a non-partisan POer. 
Back to the particulars of the OP article, this isn't the first time Snopes has "debunked" a Babylon Bee satire piece when the object of the satire was a Lib/Prog/Dem. Why Snopes thinks a Satire Site merits debunking, I don't understand.
Seems to me Snopes wasn't debunking as much as it was chastising the Bee for "fanning the flames." Or something.
As to Snopes' biases -- I believe all fact checkers are biased merely because they are all human and we all have some biases. While I'm sure most fact checkers try to leave their personal beliefs and prejudices at the door, some of those things are bound to creep in when they fact check. I believe Snopes has tried to be non-partisan, unlike a number of fact checking services run by obviously partisan individuals and entities.
I believe Snopes gets a bad rep from a number of conservatives because it may have debunked some myth(s) those conservatives desperately wanted to believe. For example, all those "suspicious" deaths linked to the alleged 'Clinton Crime Family." Not everyone who dies suddenly in Arkansas, New York or DC does so at the hand of the Clintons. Do I think the Clintons are as pure as the driven snow? Oh hell no. But I don't think they are responsible for everyone who dies unexpectedly. Snopes and more reputable fact checkers do a good service trying to put these bogus stories to rest. Unfortunately, there are so many out there who will ignore the facts and still believe the myth -- all because they don't trust Snopes or anyone else who tells them the myth is not true.
And I'll bet there are liberals who don't like Snopes because it may have debunked some myth about Trump or someone else they don't like.
