Trump tells progressive Democrats to go back and fix 'broken and crime infested places' they came fr

[Cyber Liberty]

Quoting you in hopes she doesn't also have an Administrator on Ignore....

@LegalAmerican
 Hopefully you’ll take me off of ignore longer enough to read this.

On your last statement, I think you see RIGHT THROUGH our faults perfectly!  It’s amazing how well you see things!  But @corbe has given you some AMAZING, ASTOUNDING advice here.  We knuckle draggers ARE REALLY NOT WORTH all your efforts.  You really should take a few minutes and go look at http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/*/index.   Those ASTONISHINGLY ENLIGHTENED folks over there will UNDOUBTEDLY treat you like ROYALTY!

[corbe]

Beautiful..listening...right now!  Why don't others...SEE...the truth?   . 

   Just cause we're Patriotic Americans that don't watch CNN doesn't mean we can afford another loan for glasses.


@LegalAmerican

[Axeslinger]

I did  NOT call out anyone!  If you feel convicted,  that is on you.  NOT ONE NAME WAS POSTED.  But you call me out.


My post below: not to you. And your threatening post to me, ABOVE.
----------------------------------------
Quote from: LegalAmerican on Today at 05:48:23 PM

CORRECT.  I think most on here still rely on CNN as their News site.  I have no TV.  My thoughts & beliefs are my own, having lived...STARVING SOCIALISM.   ^ 5!     

Hahaha. Well that’s about as spineless a backpedal as I’ve ever seen.

[Hoodat]

Sorry,  lame & not totally correct.  Do you understand a WORK IN PROGRESS?   TRADE DEALS WITH CANADA, MEXICO, CHINA, JAPAN ?  It takes a while for our country, to turn around.

None of this has a thing to do with the government printing up new money at the rate of $2 trillion per year and spending it.  Obama monetary policy on steroids.

Your issue is with DEMON-RATS, not my president.

My issue is with Democrats, Republicans, AND your President - none of which are acting Conservative.  And unlike you, I refuse to make excuses for our President expanding liberal policy.

All the ILLEGALS at the border who are invading us, is directly on DEMON-RATS.

Releasing captured illegals into US society is directly on President Trump.

They won't change bad laws put in by JFK...he gave ILLEGALS..WELFARE.

Trump won't enforce the laws we already have.  For example, it is a felony to re-enter the US after being deported, punishable by two years in prison.  When did Trump ever prosecute such a case?

As for JFK, his Administration pre-dates "WELFARE".  Only a complete fool would make such a claim.

Then the Celler/Hart act 1965, that JFK wanted, put into law by LBJ & Teddy.  These laws are now destroying America.  Each year, each year, from immigration site, ILLEGALS cost us $746.3 billion dollars, dealing with them!

I hate to break it to you, but by law, illegals are not eligible for federal aid, federal education assistance, etc.  The fact that Trump still sends money to States that violate these laws shows that Trump is complicit in enacting liberal policy on borrowed money and driving up the debt.

ALL ON DEMON-RATS...WHO DON'T WANT TO SECURE OUR BORDER.  WHO'S SIDE ARE THEY ON?  NOT AMERICA'S!

I am on the side of the one candidate who promised to stop giving free stuff to illegals, to deport anyone and everyone here illegally and permanently ban their return, and to secure our border.  Contrast that with your candidate who campaigned on touchback amnesty, and who has done nothing to secure our border since taking office.

For once, it would be nice to get you Trump sycophants on board to persuade the President to be the Conservative we all want.  Instead, you make excuses for every single one of his liberal excesses while bashing Conservatives like me for expecting real Conservative leadership.  <Personal insult removed.>

[corbe]

   This Thread is Useless without @GrouchoTex Music:

Talking Heads - Once in a Lifetime (Official Video)


Error 404 (Not Found)!!1

[GrouchoTex]

   This Thread is Useless without @GrouchoTex Music:

Talking Heads - Once in a Lifetime (Official Video)


Error 404 (Not Found)!!1

@corbe
Thanks!
That's the song I was thinking of.
 

[Sanguine]

What was this thread about anyway?

[corbe]

What was this thread about anyway?

   President Trump telling Congress people to get the h3ll out of my Country, I think @Sanguine but I'm often wrong. 

[Hoodat]

   President Trump telling Congress people to get the h3ll out of my Country, I think @Sanguine but I'm often wrong.

I was actually OK with this until one of his sycophants showed up making excuses for Trump being a liberal wus.

[Victoria33]

True dat.  They're in perfect harmony with the racist little shitholes that elected them.

@Cyber Liberty

I read about how Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, New York City, won her election to the US House.  The man who had that job for many years had it so long, no one ran against him.  He didn't campaign because he always won.  He didn't campaign this time, either, but had an opponent - the Cortez woman.  She knocked on doors, had friends helping her, and she won.  I don't think those people knew anything much about her, but they voted for her because she was visible and the man wasn't.

I am thinking she has been such a nutcase, they won't vote for her again, unless she is the only one running and that may be so.

[Night Hides Not]

What was this thread about anyway?

I forgot, but after reading a couple thousand of @LegalAmerican 's posts, it's obvious that her definition of "patriot" is an unswerving loyalty to President Trump.

The rest of us shlubs, many of us who served honorably in the military, are simply unable to meet that lofty standard.

[Sanguine]

@Cyber Liberty

I read about how Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, New York City, won her election to the US House.  The man who had that job for many years had it so long, no one ran against him.  He didn't campaign because he always won.  He didn't campaign this time, either, but had an opponent - the Cortez woman.  She knocked on doors, had friends helping her, and she won.  I don't think those people knew anything much about her, but they voted for her because she was visible and the man wasn't.

I am thinking she has been such a nutcase, they won't vote for her again, unless she is the only one running and that may be so.

@Victoria33 there's a little more to it than that.  Good, fairly short video that explains the process: 


http://youtu.be/1h5iv6sECGU

[TomSea]

None of this has a thing to do with the government printing up new money at the rate of $2 trillion per year and spending it.  Obama monetary policy on steroids.


My issue is with Democrats, Republicans, AND your President - none of which are acting Conservative.  And unlike you, I refuse to make excuses for our President expanding liberal policy.


Releasing captured illegals into US society is directly on President Trump.


Trump won't enforce the laws we already have.  For example, it is a felony to re-enter the US after being deported, punishable by two years in prison.  When did Trump ever prosecute such a case?

As for JFK, his Administration pre-dates "WELFARE".  Only a complete fool would make such a claim.


I hate to break it to you, but by law, illegals are not eligible for federal aid, federal education assistance, etc.  The fact that Trump still sends money to States that violate these laws shows that Trump is complicit in enacting liberal policy on borrowed money and driving up the debt.


I am on the side of the one candidate who promised to stop giving free stuff to illegals, to deport anyone and everyone here illegally and permanently ban their return, and to secure our border.  Contrast that with your candidate who campaigned on touchback amnesty, and who has done nothing to secure our border since taking office.

For once, it would be nice to get you Trump sycophants on board to persuade the President to be the Conservative we all want.  Instead, you make excuses for every single one of his liberal excesses while bashing Conservatives like me for expecting real Conservative leadership.  You disgust me.

Fine, have it your way,

Your candidate didn't defeat ISIS,

Didn't stop NK from delivering missiles willy-nilly ,

Hasn't done the fine things for the pro-life movement and I will go with what the movement says, not someone who has an interest in denying this.
.
Under whose admin, historic rates of minority unemployment  are occuring.

Your candidated has likely supported the other guy's candidate, fwiw

[Cyber Liberty]

@Cyber Liberty

I read about how Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, New York City, won her election to the US House.  The man who had that job for many years had it so long, no one ran against him.  He didn't campaign because he always won.  He didn't campaign this time, either, but had an opponent - the Cortez woman.  She knocked on doors, had friends helping her, and she won.  I don't think those people knew anything much about her, but they voted for her because she was visible and the man wasn't.

I am thinking she has been such a nutcase, they won't vote for her again, unless she is the only one running and that may be so.

@Victoria33

Sums up what I understood about it as well, thanks!  I don't see how the local Rats in Brooklyn would let anybody challenge her, or collect more than a handful of Republican votes in a General election. 

She'll have a serious war-chest going for her in '20.

[Hoodat]

Fine, have it your way,

Your candidate didn't defeat ISIS .  .  .  blah  .  .  blah  .  .  .  blah

Ah, we're back to this old bit.  Since Cruz isn't President, he gets condemned for not doing what Presidents do.  It's one of the more pathetic tactics I have seen here.  The fact that Trump has increase the national debt by nearly $5 trillion in 2½ years is completely offset by the fact that Cruz has not done anything as President.

Like I said, it would have been nice to have you on board in helping pull Trump to the right on fiscal policy, immigration policy, etc.  But instead, you make excuses for Trump's liberal actions while bashing others for demanding Conservative leadership.

[Formerly Once-Ler]

@LegalAmerican
 Hopefully you’ll take me off of ignore longer enough to read this.

On your last statement, I think you see RIGHT THROUGH our faults perfectly!  It’s amazing how well you see things!  But @corbe has given you some AMAZING, ASTOUNDING advice here.  We knuckle draggers ARE REALLY NOT WORTH all your efforts.  You really should take a few minutes and go look at http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/*/index.   Those ASTONISHINGLY ENLIGHTENED folks over there will UNDOUBTEDLY treat you like ROYALTY!

Top Notch

[NavyCanDo]

Cutting through all the crud, I got a question about the tweet. Did Trump in the tweet call them "four women of color" or did ABC News insert that themselves making it sound like it may have been in his tweet?

Hoping he did not, because that would make that tweet far more controversial than without it.

[Maj. Bill Martin]

Cutting through all the crud, I got a question about the tweet. Did Trump in the tweet call them "four women of color" or did ABC News insert that themselves making it sound like it may have been in his tweet?

Hoping he did not, because that would make that tweet far more controversial than without it.

Nope.  He never mentioned their color, ethnicity, etc...

[NavyCanDo]

Nope.  He never mentioned their color, ethnicity, etc...

Thought so. It was the Liberal media that emphasized their color, and purposely added it in the middle of his quoted tweet.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Cutting through all the crud, I got a question about the tweet. Did Trump in the tweet call them "four women of color" or did ABC News insert that themselves making it sound like it may have been in his tweet? 

The President did not call them "four women of color" ... he did not mention color at all @NavyCanDo    Here's the full tweet:

Donald J. Trump‏
Verified account  @realDonaldTrump

So interesting to see “Progressive” Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly......

....and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run. Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how....


....it is done. These places need your help badly, you can’t leave fast enough. I’m sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements!


5:27 AM - 14 Jul 2019

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1150381396994723841

[Formerly Once-Ler]

Everyone knows Trump didn't write those tweets.  ..." from which they came."  Come on.  Probably Steven Miller. 

[edpc]

I say, that does not mean anything...since they have not assimilated into being American.  I am American & support my president. ( With good reason) I am a citizen. I was not born here. Came here legally & pledge ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG ....

Fantastic. How about you go back and instill that enthusiasm from whence you came?

[Formerly Once-Ler]

Fantastic. How about you go back and instill that enthusiasm from whence you came?

OMG.
I award you 500 Once-Ler points for funniest post of the day.

[XenaLee]

Cutting through all the crud, I got a question about the tweet. Did Trump in the tweet call them "four women of color" or did ABC News insert that themselves making it sound like it may have been in his tweet?

Hoping he did not, because that would make that tweet far more controversial than without it.

Here's a rule of thumb that has never ever failed me....

and I'm talking going on three decades now.

If it's coming from a leftist presshole, a leftist media outlet, a leftist network or a damned Democrat... (pardon the redundancy, ie same damned thing)....

you can pretty much bank on it and bet money on it that they are LYING.

[sneakypete]

Telling the truth about the democommies destructive policies. Good for Trump.

@austingirl  ,One Gazillion times