Jeffrey Epstein arrested for sex trafficking of minors in Florida and New York: Report

[rustynail]

What if it is modified by "egg-shaped," does that make a difference in this context?

(lol) Just read about the 'egg' man.  Now about the Walrus?

[txradioguy]

I'm not on this thread defending Donald Trump, you "bleep". (my word)

You have been dying inside for 4 years here trying to tell us how intuitive you are.

On you and a couple of other thin skinned clingers here seem to think I'm in some kind of all fired hurry to show how smart I am.

And my track record on what I've said about Trump shows what a liar you are about your belief that I hope he fails.

That's your imagination not reality. 

And you're hitting below the Medoza Line.

An accusation of doing that by the subject matter expert on low expectations and outcomes is quite the compliment.

[Right_in_Virginia]

It's probably a safe bet that the word "erection" wasn't the word that was used.

No it's not.

[XenaLee]

That's what makes this so interesting....  that underlying (compound) question that most of us have: who is pulling these strings, and why are they being pulled at this moment?

Is there a level of desperation ramped so high (perhaps because of what may be happening (soon?) with Messrs. Barr and Durham, or some other reason?) that the perceived need to GET TRUMP is to the point that the Clintons and others are now viewed as expandable?  (Reference Pelosi's daughter's "Faves" Tweet very soon after the arrest news surfaced on Saturday evening.)

(Also HRC is supposedly tied to this directly (without having clung to WJC's coattails) as she is said to have been a passenger on the jet and multiple island visitor herself.)

 

Exactly.   That "we live in interesting times" is fast becoming a vast understatement.   

[XenaLee]

What if it is modified by "egg-shaped," does that make a difference in this context?

I was thinking more along the lines of "droopy".   

[Sanguine]

What if it is modified by "egg-shaped," does that make a difference in this context?

 

[XenaLee]

It's probably a safe bet that the word "erection" wasn't the word that was used.

Well.... you probably already know by now....

I have always had an extremely active/vivid imagination.   

[Victoria33]

@Sanguine   If he's not involved he needs to get out in front of this very VERY quickly and explain his relationship with Epstein and the mysterious hiring of the Federal Attorney that gave Epstein his sweetheart plea deal as the new Secretary of Labor.

@txradioguy

Trump was charged a number of years ago, plus not long ago, by an underage girl, of having rough sex with her more than once, at Epstein's townhouse.  She was kept there by Epstein.  Trump's lawyer got the case put off more than once, and she finally gave up; maybe a judge dropped the case.  At one time I had that information, don't think I kept it.  I can find it again for more details.

[LilLamb]

From the first time I heard the quote from Trump about Epstein liking younger women, I’ve always thought it wasn’t admiration, but a subtle dis from Trump. The whole thing just reads strange. Trump does that often. He says really nice things about someone and then adds a little dig.

I’m in no way a Trump lover.  I support him as President, but I don’t like his personality at all. Unlike Bill Clinton there is no evidence that he ever went to the island. He flew in the plane twice. That could have been an attempt by Epstein to get blackmailing material against Trump. He had Trumps number in his phone book, but he also had Ivana and Ivanka’s number in there, too. I think this is just more crap being thrown at the fan. I’m not concerned about it.

[edpc]

(lol) Just read about the 'egg' man.  Now about the Walrus?

Daniels also used a food item, to describe Trump. Between the ‘eggs’ and ‘mushrooms,’ you probably want to avoid the omelette bar at Mar-a-Lago.

[EdJames]

Why @EdJames ?  I'd rather know the details first, including who approved the plea deal and why.  This has to do with a well known billionaire ..... "higher ups" had to have been involved.  In addition, a few reprinted reports from back then reported there was real fear Epstein would walk .... without so much as a slap on the wrist.

I'd like more dispassionate information before Acosta is cut loose.

I read a ton of stuff yesterday (and I wished that I saved the articles and links, I'm sure that I will stumble upon them again in the coming days and will ping you) that illustrated how Acosta operated within the process leading up to (and after) the plea deal.  In short, he sold out the interests of the victims by withholding legally required notifications amongst other actions, and he unethically (and perhaps illegally) conspired (yes, loaded word, chosen deliberately) with the defense throughout the process.

There was no genuine fear of JE walking as they had multiple victims willing to testify.  That lie was merely a justification for the horrendous actions of the prosecution.

The "I was only following orders" defense doesn't work for the United States Attorney.

@Right_in_Virginia

[EdJames]

I was thinking more along the lines of "droopy".   

Oh no, "droopy" wasn't mentioned....  right here in this very thread we read about the "egg-shaped" erection....  IIRC there was a video included!!

 

[EdJames]

@txradioguy

Trump was charged a number of years ago, plus not long ago, by an underage girl, of having rough sex with her more than once, at Epstein's townhouse.  She was kept there by Epstein.  Trump's lawyer got the case put off more than once, and she finally gave up; maybe a judge dropped the case.  At one time I had that information, don't think I kept it.  I can find it again for more details.

He wasn't "charged" at all, he was "accused" by an anonymous person.  The reason that the case never progressed is that the accuser's existence could never be validated.

[XenaLee]

Oh no, "droopy" wasn't mentioned....  right here in this very thread we read about the "egg-shaped" erection....  IIRC there was a video included!!

 

What can I say?   

[EdJames]

From the first time I heard the quote from Trump about Epstein liking younger women, I’ve always thought it wasn’t admiration, but a subtle dis from Trump. The whole thing just reads strange. Trump does that often. He says really nice things about someone and then adds a little dig.

I’m in no way a Trump lover.  I support him as President, but I don’t like his personality at all. Unlike Bill Clinton there is no evidence that he ever went to the island. He flew in the plane twice. That could have been an attempt by Epstein to get blackmailing material against Trump. He had Trumps number in his phone book, but he also had Ivana and Ivanka’s number in there, too. I think this is just more crap being thrown at the fan. I’m not concerned about it.

I saw it that way as well.

[mystery-ak]

I will wait for all the facts but if Trump is involved with Epstein there is NO defending him..

[Right_in_Virginia]

I read a ton of stuff yesterday (and I wished that I saved the articles and links, I'm sure that I will stumble upon them again in the coming days and will ping you) that illustrated how Acosta operated within the process leading up to (and after) the plea deal.  In short, he sold out the interests of the victims by withholding legally required notifications amongst other actions, and he unethically (and perhaps illegally) conspired (yes, loaded word, chosen deliberately) with the defense throughout the process.

There was no genuine fear of JE walking as they had multiple victims willing to testify.  That lie was merely a justification for the horrendous actions of the prosecution.

The "I was only following orders" defense doesn't work for the United States Attorney.

@Right_in_Virginia

Fine.  Let's fire the Labor Secretary.  Yeah, that's what we need to do. 

[sneakypete]

The Epstein indictment is disappointing and not nearly as aggressive as it could be. No mention of Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton.

@mountaineer

(Foghorn Leghorn voice) AHM SHOCKED! SHOCKED,AH TELLS YA!

Why,when ah wuz a boy.........

[Right_in_Virginia]

I will wait for all the facts but if Trump is involved with Epstein there is NO defending him..

That's quite a red line @mystery-ak   How about defining "involved with"?

[EdJames]

Fine.  Let's fire the Labor Secretary.  Yeah, that's what we need to do.

Damn right!  I knew that you would agree with me!!   

 

[XenaLee]

Damn right!  I knew that you would agree with me!!   

 

LOL!

[truth_seeker]

Oh, the irony. 

I posit that this new/renewed interest in Epstein is just the deep state's ongoing attempts to .....

(wait for it)...

GET TRUMP.....  ie get him out of office and out of DC....

by any means necessary.

Supposedly Mike Cernovich played a role, in getting to this point. He has a couple of recent episodes on his Periscope.

Another name isJack Probesiec. is another key name.

[DCPatriot]

I will wait for all the facts but if Trump is involved with Epstein there is NO defending him..

Of course there isn't. 

Who, on the thread is defending him?     

[Right_in_Virginia]

Damn right!  I knew that you would agree with me!!   

 

First, we'll need to fire the Senate ... they voted him in. 

[sneakypete]

Epstein had all the money in the world, too, and yet there he was, using it to traffick underage girls.  Not such a good argument. 
 

@Bill Cipher

There is no amount of money that will allow you to pimp out children in western nations. You would have to go to a Muslim or African country to be able to get away with that.