The 3 Biggest Lies About the Central Park Five - Jack Kerwick, Frontpagemag

[TomSea]

Excerpt:

The 3 Biggest Lies About the Central Park Five
A new Netflix series perpetuates the myths.
June 14, 2019    Jack Kerwick

...

Biggest Lie #1: The CP5 Didn’t Do It.

On that fateful evening of April 19, 1989, when Trisha Meili, a 28 year-old white woman and investment banker who would become known to the world as “the Central Park Jogger,” was attacked, large numbers of black and Hispanic teenagers were “wilding” through Central Park, pummeling and mugging unsuspecting park-goers. Korey Wise, Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Raymond Santana, and Yusef Salaam—the CP5—were among this pack of predators. In addition to having been arrested for the attack on Meili, they were arrested as well for having unleashed violence upon at least six other men, beatings so brutal that one victim lost consciousness and another sustained permanent, life-altering injuries.

To the present day, neither the CP5 nor their apologists have disputed their guilt over these attacks.

So that we get a sense of the context within which this notorious event occurred, it would be helpful to realize that the CP5 were among a few dozen black and Hispanic teenagers who were in Central Park this night for one purpose and one purpose only: to harm other human beings.

Read more at: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273977/3-biggest-lies-about-central-park-five-jack-kerwick

This has been in the news a lot, on the Larry Elder show, etc. I caught something somewhere yesterday about it and these guys I believe sued NY and were rewarded with a big sum of money.

[sneakypete]

 

So that we get a sense of the context within which this notorious event occurred, it would be helpful to realize that the CP5 were among a few dozen black and Hispanic teenagers who were in Central Park this night for one purpose and one purpose only: to harm other human beings.

Close,but no cigar. They were there to attack,beat,and rob WHITE people. Preferably women and elderly men who were unable to fight back.

[goatprairie]

The stories emerging aver that the CP5 were "exonerated" because a confession was made by some other criminal whose DNA was found on the woman.
The facts are the CP5 were in the park attacking many people that night which they don't deny.
They not only confessed to beating her in front of detectives, they all had family members in the interview room with them. A number of them bragged to friends about beating and violating the woman.
But because lack of DNA evidence (which was in its infancy at the time and likely much of destroyed by investigators) of the five has people believing they're innocent.
 How did people get convicted before DNA testing?  There are still people convicted today without DNA evidence.
They're guilty as hell.

[skeeter]

Just heard one very angry black caller to a radio show repeating the lie these 5 'children' (his words) were 'exonerated'.

[Fishrrman]

Absolutely right, Goat.

Guilty as hell.
They were back then.
They still are.
Only fools could be goaded into believing otherwise.