Don't be so sure. You've no doubt heard calls from some of the Dems for the need to codify Roe v. Wade. They understand the peril that this individual right faces in the face of determined efforts to force a re-evaluation of Roe and its pivotal follow-up ruling, Casey, by delivering a test case to the SCOTUS. The libs will seek to do the same to try to force a re-evaluation of Heller, and perhaps even the overturning of the individual right found by that decision.
The 2A's predicate clause make it inherently flawed. Its plain language requires the interpretation of the Court in order to provide the individual right that folks take for granted. What the Court giveth, it can taketh away. If the Dems are smart enough to understand that Roe must be codified, then why aren't Republicans willing to advocate for the same thing with Heller?
R0o is not Written in the Constitution, not a protected Right, but one made up by 5 jurists.
Go ahead, argue for a natural right to murder your offspring.
It does not exist.
What deity would have babies sacrificed on the altar of convenience?
How does nature crave shedding the blood of millions of innocents, not in warfare, even, but because they were 'unplanned'?
The idea of eliminating one's own progeny flies in the face of all natural instinct to perpetuate genetics and the species.
However, it is universal to argue for the right of self-defense, including from a tyrannical government.
It is a natural Right; an unalienable Right.
It exists, with or without the scribblings of those who would decide what people can and cannot do under their dominion.
"Codifying" it only makes it appear as if the Right is somehow granted by government.
It is not.
If it was granted by government, it could be removed by government.
Government did not grant it.
So, it is only respected or infringed by government.
Despite a good start, the infringements mount.