Author Topic: How to End Endless War. The case against American military supremacy  (Read 255 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
How to End Endless War
The case against American military supremacy
By Stephen Wertheim
March 22, 2019
 

In 1992, Pentagon officials took stock of America’s fortunes. “Today, there is no global challenger to a peaceful democratic order,” observed the group, led by Under Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz. The Soviet Union had fallen. America stood alone as a global power. At such a moment, the country might have declared victory and brought its troops home. Instead, it resolved to seek greater supremacy than ever. In the future that Wolfowitz and his colleagues envisioned, the United States would maintain a “predominant military position” atop the world. No one would dare rival it.

In the Middle East, America’s pursuit of primacy led it to contain both Iraq and Iran, and to treat the advance of either as a grave threat. Under this dictate, successive presidents imposed sanctions that starved Iraqis and squeezed Iranians. They launched wars to change regimes. They partnered with authoritarians throughout the region. If all this was the price of keeping America on top, so be it.

https://newrepublic.com/article/153239/end-endless-war-case-against-american-military-supremacy

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Re: How to End Endless War. The case against American military supremacy
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2019, 10:58:21 am »
Is this article suggesting the best way to end all wars is to become isolationist?  What good is a "potent" military against communist superpowers like China and Russia?  A 357 magnum is a "potent" weapon on it's own but a toy compared to a tank. This is more a leftist prescription for being overtaken rather than to end wars. :tongue2: