Catholic School Student In Viral Video with Native American Elder Condemns 'Outright Lies'

[musiclady]

Since the House Chamber won't be full when POTUS gives the SOTU speech, he should invite the affected Covington HS students, parents and siblings.

They can then send out for Chick-Fil-A and drive the liberals nutz.

 

[Cyber Liberty]

Let me be the first to say I'm not participating in anything @XenaLee wants.  She doesn't want friends and I'm not gonna try to be one.

@Emjay
@XenaLee

I consider both of you my friends.   

[XenaLee]

@Emjay
@XenaLee

I consider both of you my friends.   

I consider you a friend, too, CL!   

[Axeslinger]

@Emjay
@XenaLee

I consider both of you my friends.   

@Cyber Liberty

Heretic!!!!!

 

[Cyber Liberty]

I consider you a friend, too, CL!   

 

[Cyber Liberty]

@Cyber Liberty

Heretic!!!!!

 

[sneakypete]

Since the House Chamber won't be full when POTUS gives the SOTU speech, he should invite the affected Covington HS students, parents and siblings.

They can then send out for Chick-Fil-A and drive the liberals nutz.

@DCPatriot

EXCELLENT idea! I  hope he does it.

Know anyone with WH connections that can suggest it to him?

[verga]

Since the House Chamber won't be full when POTUS gives the SOTU speech, he should invite the affected Covington HS students, parents and siblings.

They can then send out for Chick-Fil-A and drive the liberals nutz.

I would also pack it with Angel  family members. Put real faces to the problem of illegal immigration. Let the American people see them up close.

[txradioguy]

Since the House Chamber won't be full when POTUS gives the SOTU speech, he should invite the affected Covington HS students, parents and siblings.

They can then send out for Chick-Fil-A and drive the liberals nutz.

@DCPatriot excellent idea!

[GrouchoTex]

@GrouchoTex

Uhhhhh.....uhhhhh,nope. Not gonna say it.

 

[Emjay]

And if that happens we're no better than that idiot Yarmouth who wants to ban teens from wearing MAGA hats.

But hey I guess it's ok if it's your side that's doing it...right?


If you don't like the story source...don't read it or comment on it.

In theory I agree with you.  But these so-called news organizations have become nothing more than propaganda shills.  Still, I wouldn't ban them.  Just know them for what they are and ignore them.

They really shot themselves in the foot with this story and, if they were capable of embarrassment, they would be red as beets.

[Emjay]

And if that happens we're no better than that idiot Yarmouth who wants to ban teens from wearing MAGA hats.

But hey I guess it's ok if it's your side that's doing it...right?


If you don't like the story source...don't read it or comment on it.

That would have been a good post if you hadn't chosen to go snarky with the 'your side' comment.

[Emjay]

I do it all the time.  Never get credit for it.  But people do it every day on this forum.

You're not even capable of defending yourself without taking a shot at "people on this forum."

[Emjay]

That's pure bovine feces and you know it.  That's just a victim card you and a few others like to play.  Last time I checked...the most virulent anti Trump people were banned.  Haven't seen any of the intentional disruptors from your camp given the axe.  They left on their own because this wasn't turning into an Orange echo chamber.

You've referenced that 'victim card' so much, I expect it is dog eared.  Get a new meme.

[Emjay]

Yeah, I have noticed several of the "AT's" rear their fascist heads by commenting that "certain posters" should be banned (silenced).  For hellsakes... this is a damned political discussion forum.   What kind of "discussion" can be had when all of the dissenting opinions are eliminated?  And they go on to "instruct" folks they disagree with on how to post and what not to post, etc.

I may not agree with or like what some here have to say, but I respect their right to say it... as long as it complies with Myst's rules.   I have NEVER advocated that someone be banned from a site just because of their political ideology.  That kind of thinking is in lockstep with the radical left and their websites (like DU).  I spit on 'that kind of thinking', IOW.

But @XenaLee you have no problem with being horribly nasty to them.  I haven't seen that much respect.  Guess it depends on how YOU define it.

[Emjay]

OK then Tex. I'm going to start posting stories from Stormfront because I don't want to be caught up in the banning hysteria.

Right, don't want to do that, huh, @Amb. Frank Cannon

[Emjay]

@Emjay
@XenaLee

I consider both of you my friends.   

You are a good person, @Cyber Liberty   Unfortunately, I just can't like someone who is constantly nasty to me.

[XenaLee]

But @XenaLee you have no problem with being horribly nasty to them.  I haven't seen that much respect.  Guess it depends on how YOU define it.

Oh FFS... here you go again... showing your azz and starting more $hit.

Show me ONE post of mine where I have been "horribly nasty".   Your butt is just out of joint because I have called you on your shtick when YOU were being "nasty" to someone here.  Your problem, not mine.   Again.... I challenge you (officially the head trouble-maker at TBR now).... to show me a post where I have come anywhere even close to your spew and BS.  In fact, I challenge any of the mods here to back up your BS claim.

Either put up or (finally) STFU.

[txradioguy]

That would have been a good post if you hadn't chosen to go snarky with the 'your side' comment.

That's a comment I use regardless of political party when one side suddenly decides to make ham fisted moves or decisions simply becasue their side is in office.

Things that they would normally rail against or have railed against in the past.

[XenaLee]

You are a good person, @Cyber Liberty   Unfortunately, I just can't like someone who is constantly nasty to me.

And your definition of "nasty" is anyone that calls you out on your spew and bashing of others here.

Got it.

I'll proudly wear that hat and that label.

 

[txradioguy]

You've referenced that 'victim card' so much, I expect it is dog eared.  Get a new meme.

Quit playing the victim and I'll stop pointing out the bait and switch you do with that victim card.

Just like you're trying to do right now.

Not sure what stick is up your @ss this morning to drag this back out after three days of this horse being dead...

[XenaLee]

Quit playing the victim and I'll stop pointing out the bait and switch you do with that victim card.

Just like you're trying to do right now.

Not sure what stick is up your @ss this morning to drag this back out after three days of this horse being dead...

I can answer that!   She's a trouble-maker (Hint:  Troll).

All day long and twice on Sundays, in fact....lololol.

[Emjay]

That's a comment I use regardless of political party when one side suddenly decides to make ham fisted moves or decisions simply becasue their side is in office.

Things that they would normally rail against or have railed against in the past.

I do not go along with banning CNN from this site but I find it hard to understand why anyone would want to post a story from them without serious fact checking.

But see, here is your problem:  'ham fisted' 'rail against' and especially 'victim.'

Try to improve.

[Emjay]

Quit playing the victim and I'll stop pointing out the bait and switch you do with that victim card.

Just like you're trying to do right now.

Not sure what stick is up your @ss this morning to drag this back out after three days of this horse being dead...

Well, this is the first time I've posted on this thread and I saw some comments that needed replies.

Just trying to help you.  Why is disagreeing with you and pointing our your numerous errors playing the victim card?  Or do you think you are the victim who is being played, cause I'm certainly not.

[Frank Cannon]

Right, don't want to do that, huh, @Amb. Frank Cannon

Any particular reason you are dredging up a 2 day old argument that the boss told the folks involved in to walk away from?