The Best Friend Nazis and White Supremacists Have Is the Liberal Media

[rangerrebew]

The Best Friend Nazis and White Supremacists Have Is the Liberal Media
John Hawkins   
25 Aug, 2018 by John Hawkins   
 

Did you hear about the second Unite the Right white supremacist rally in D.C.? You must have heard about it because it was all over the news. In fact, it was so well covered by the media that there were more reporters at the event than white supremacists.

Notice that according to this guy, who does photos for the Washington Post, there were more reporters than participants at this wildly hyped white supremacist rally. It is also worth noting that he rather casually conflates white supremacists with Trump supporters as if there is no difference between them. Let’s break that down because it’s very significant.

https://rightwingnews.com/column-2/best-friend-nazis-white-supremacists-liberal-media/

[The_Reader_David]

Not really.  It's the academic left and the race grievance industry.  The loathsome, but perceptive, Richard Spencer correctly characterized the writings of Ta Nehesi Coates as a "photographic negative of white supremacy".  Had the academic left and the race hustlers who grabbed the civil rights mantle in the wake of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassination not kept the schemas of white supremacism alive, albeit inverted, and instead embraced MLK Jr.'s Christian humanism, there wouldn't be a 21st century white-supremacist movement. 

[Fishrrman]

Readin' Dave wrote:
"Had the academic left and the race hustlers who grabbed the civil rights mantle in the wake of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassination not kept the schemas of white supremacism alive, albeit inverted, and instead embraced MLK Jr.'s Christian humanism, there wouldn't be a 21st century white-supremacist movement."

An impertinent question, if I may ask:
How long before what's now commonly derided as a "21st century white-supremacist movement" becomes a struggle for cultural and [perhaps even] ethnic survival?