Not really. It's the academic left and the race grievance industry. The loathsome, but perceptive, Richard Spencer correctly characterized the writings of Ta Nehesi Coates as a "photographic negative of white supremacy". Had the academic left and the race hustlers who grabbed the civil rights mantle in the wake of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassination not kept the schemas of white supremacism alive, albeit inverted, and instead embraced MLK Jr.'s Christian humanism, there wouldn't be a 21st century white-supremacist movement.