Why NY Times Freaked Out About Trump’s Proposed Reversal of Obama's Extra-Constitutional Lawlessness

[rangerrebew]

Why NY Times Freaked Out About Trump’s Proposed Reversal of Obama's Extra-Constitutional Lawlessness

Last Friday, the headline of a breathless New York Times article read, “‘Transgender’ Could Be Defined Out of Existence By Trump Administration [1]. Not true.

According to the New York Times, a memo from the Department of Health and Human Services would instruct government agencies to “define gender as a biological, immutable condition determined by genitalia at birth.” Thus, “an explicit and uniform definition of gender” would be used across government policy, and would be understood “on a biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective and administrable.”


Source URL: https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/john-stonestreet/new-york-times-freaks-out-about-trumps-reversal-obamas-extra

[Jazzhead]

It is interesting to note that the mantra was for years that one could not choose to be gay,  but that it was a "wired in" characteristic.    That's ultimately a question for science, but it seems intuitively correct to me.

But now the mantra is that gender itself is a matter of choice.   You are a girl if you consider yourself a girl,  notwithstanding your junk dangling down.   

The left needs to seriously get its act together.   Either balls have meaning or they don't.