I see you got your copy of the democrat talking points.
I have spent a lot of time reading Judge Kavanaugh's decisions. Why did he find it necessary to contradict himself? That's not a talking point; it's fact. It was a minor point; he didn't need to go there. I'll post some quotes in a minute.
Like Sacks v. US Dept of Defense: "As the Government notes, law enforcement agencies use polygraphs to test the credibility of witnesses and criminal defendants. Those agencies also use polygraphs to “screen applicants for security clearances so that they may be deemed suitable for work in critical law enforcement, defense, and intelligence collection roles.†Declaration of Alesia Y. Williams, Defense Intelligence Agency, Chief of FOIA Services Section, at Joint Appendix 226. In Morley v. CIA, we stated: “Background investigations conducted to assess an applicant’s qualification, such as … clearance and investigatory processes, inherently relate to law enforcement.†508 F.3d 1108, 1128–29 (D.C.Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks omitted)."