OK, here is what I was responding to:
I have to note that you are presenting an emotional, fact-free argument.
Not an argument, but a fact that there are few conservative women in the Senate, ever. And the Supreme Court has had zero, although SDOC started out sorta conservative she drifted substantially away from conservatism. NO matter what you say about few women being in "upper politics", it is still a fact that women who do get there infrequently conservative.
I also note that you have managed to insult every good, conservative woman on this board.
How so? I never attacked anybody on this board. I addressed women who get into political office, and made that with exceptions. I believe that response is proving my point on the emotional character I had made.
The reason that there are few conservative women in upper level politics is because: 1. there are fewer women than men overall in upper level politics,
but it is irrefutable that those women who do make it there are prone to be NOT conservative. That is factual. Check the ACU report card.
2. there have been fewer women in the pipeline, but that is changing quickly,
Got any actual facts to back that one up?
3. conservative women place more value on family values than do democrat women and tend to walk the talk,
Of course they do and I am married to one, but what has that got to do with anything we have discussed?
and 4. women, generally, are not as interested in those endeavors.
I believe you mean
conservative women.
None of the above factors imply that women who do decide to go into these fields do a lesser job than do the men who go into those fields.
no one ever said that. Did I not mention Maggie Thatcher? I lived in the UK during her years as PM and I admired her to no end. I look at all politicians, both men and women, with her as the model to follow.
