They do both extremely well. But your point is well made.
Hiding the truth is perhaps more evil than lying in my opinion. Or printing half truths. A kernel of truth in a story while omitting pertinent information leaves the lib media pleading not guilty of lying while not allowing the full story to be aired/printed.
Outright lies i.e Bush and Cheney dynamited the dikes in NO during Katrina are easily refuted. Omitting stories of inaction or incompetence by Lousiana Dems during the hurricane made it seem the fed. gov. was responsible for all the problems that occurred during the catastrophe. For the general public the blame for all problems was placed on the shoulders of the fed. gov. despite the gov. and the NO mayor being totally incompetent and refusing fed. help before and during the first moments of the storm.
Many blacks still believe Bush and Cheney deliberately dynamited the dikes. You wouldn't think people with half a brain would believe such things, but with the help of the lib media many brain dead Americans swallow idiotic, conspiracy theories.
