Author Topic: IRONY: Social Media Mob Comes For Sarah Jeong, Who Cheered Social Media Mobbing Of Others  (Read 279 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 384,061
  • Let's Go Brandon!
 ByBen Shapiro
@benshapiro
August 2, 2018
57.7k views

I’ve already argued today that Sarah Jeong, the new New York Times editorial board member, shouldn’t be fired for her old racist tweets, since social media mobbing has become far too prevalent, and since her tweets were known about by her employer when they hired her.

With that said, Sarah Jeong is one of the biggest hypocrites in America if she thinks she opposes the social media mob now targeting her. On occasion after occasion, she has come out in favor of social media mobbing, including the destruction of lives and careers.

Take, for example, her reaction to the destruction of Tim Hunt. Hunt, a former honorary professor with the University College London School of Life And Medical Sciences, and Nobel Prize-winner in physiology and medicine, as well as recipient of the Royal Medal, was destroyed over a poorly-made sexist joke. He had no history of sexism, and female members of his laboratory came to his defense. His wife is a prominent scientist in her own right. His joke, in context, was clearly a reference to his own marriage; he followed up by stating that segregation of the sexes in the laboratory would make men worse off. But here was Jeong’s response after Hunt was mobbed out of a job and forced to leave his home country:

more
https://www.dailywire.com/news/33976/irony-social-media-mob-comes-sarah-jeong-who-ben-shapiro
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
shouldn’t be fired for her old racist tweets,

Why not? I find it absurd to make this argument.