@EasyAce
Whine,bitch,whine. I would think you would know other tunes.
@sneakypete I would think
you know better than to just throw down the "whine, bitch, whine" bit at an opinion expressed quite calmly but contrary to or at least challenging to your own for no reason better than that it
does oppose yours. Manifestly, that kind of throwdown a) exposes you as talking beyond your competence absent a true rebuttal; and, b) hurts you more than it does your opponent.
You used to be smarter than that in the LibertyPost days.
BTW,which loser did you support?
I voted "None of These Candidates" in 2016, there being no candidate who impressed me as anything resembling presidential material, never mind the kind of material that stands foursquare and without compromise for freedom, for individual rights and responsibilities, and for a properly construed
government---whose sole legitimate business, other than defending us against enemies (actual and
provably iminent) from abroad and predators (
real predators, not mere vicemongers) at home, is
staying the hell out of your business, my business, everyone's business,
until or unless one would obstruct or abrogate another's equivalent rights. (A government which would also, by the way, stand athwart the ever continuing Cult of the Presidency to which Donaldus Minimus's most recalcitrant sycophants [or should that be psychophants, in some cases?] plight their troth as assuredly as did those of His Excellency Al-Hashish Field Marshmallow Dr. Barack Obama Dada, COD, RIP, LSMFT, Would-Have-Been Life President of the Republic Formerly Known as the United States, Presidents Lips I and II, and Droopy Drawers Clinton, to name just four. (Don't bother with,
But . . . Hilarious Rodent Clinton! She lost. Get over it.)
Since Nevada doesn't allow a write-in vote, denying me the pleasure of writing in the name Groucho Marx (I'll revisit that anon), but
does allow "None of These Candidates," it was the only vote to cast without feeling immediately as though I'd need a complete and possibly extended delousing.
(Why write in Groucho if I had the chance? Easy: 1) He once said, "Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it, misdiagnosing it, and misapplying the wrong solutions." Which showed more political wisdom than anything ejaculated by any of the 2016 presidential candidates. 2) If the dead can still vote in Chicago, the living have the concurrent right to vote for the dead. And the dead can't possibly wreak any mischief, can they?)