The body you advocate destroying and causing great pain in the process, is a separate human being INSIDE a woman's body.
Why do you continue denying what is true?
Why do you continue distorting the argument with leftist false platitudes?
You certainly must realize how badly you are losing this argument, don't you?
Probably best for you to bow out to avoid further embarrassment.
(btw, unless you once had a uterus and ovaries filled with eggs, you were NEVER your mother's body. Oy 
).
I’m not denying anything that is true. I am simply asserting that, as a general matter, each individual has the fundamental right to decide what happens with his or her body. In the context of a pregnancy, that fundamental right includes the right to decide whether to continue playing host to another human being. And that this right cannot be countermanded by the government through the prohibition of abortion so long as that other human being remains nonviable; i.e., is not sufficiently developed to survive outside the womb by, for example, not having lungs capable of absorbing oxygen from the air breathed in yet. After that point, once the fetus has become viable in a meaningful sense, and only then, does the government have a sufficient interest in the fetus that it can limit the woman’s ability to abort the fetus.
For the fetuses existence to have sufficient weight to outweigh the woman’s right to control her own body, it’s separate existence must have become meaningful in some concrete way that would allow it some real possibility of surviving apart from the woman. Until then, it’s existence is not sufficient to outweigh her rights because it has no existence apart from its connection to her.
