The female has the freedom and the liberty, yet the male and the child are denied theirs by virtue of this process.
I find it interesting that this would be argued as conservatism.
They are not denied anything of the sort.
With respect to the man, your argument is with biology, not the law. It is a simple fact that the woman is the one to whom the fetus attaches, and therefore her interest in controlling her own body which has the most effect. The man is not being denied any freedom whatsoever that the woman has: he has the freedom to control what happens to his own body just as much as she does.
With respect to the fetus: until it is viable, the woman’s rights are paramount. That is the result of the need to balance competing interests, and that is the result because otherwise the woman is turned into a slave for the sake of something that cannot exist without being attached to her body.